ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Deep ocular tumor classification model using cuckoo search algorithm and Caputo fractional gradient descent.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging-based machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Design of efficient generalized digital fractional order differentiators using an improved whale optimization algorithm.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Ocular Oncology, Retinoblastoma (ArMOR): Experience with a Multiracial Cohort.Cancers · 2024Article
- Optimal wideband digital fractional-order differentiators using gradient based optimizer.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Enhancing breast cancer diagnosis using deep learning and gradient multi-verse optimizer: a robust biomedical data analysis approach.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While digital ocular fundus images are commonly used for diagnosing ocular tumors, interpreting these images poses challenges due to their complexity and the subtle features specific to tumors. Automated detection of ocular tumors is crucial for timely diagnosis and effective treatment. This study investigates a robust deep learning system designed for classifying ocular tumors. The article introduces a novel optimizer that integrates the Caputo fractional gradient descent (CFGD) method with the cuckoo search algorithm (CSA) to enhance accuracy and convergence speed, seeking optimal solutions. The proposed optimizer's performance is assessed by training well-known Vgg16, AlexNet, and GoogLeNet models on 400 fundus images, equally divided between benign and malignant classes. Results demonstrate the significant potential of the proposed optimizer in improving classification accuracy and convergence speed. In particular, the mean accuracy attained by the proposed optimizer is 86.43%, 87.42%, and 87.62% for the Vgg16, AlexNet, and GoogLeNet models, respectively. The performance of our optimizer is compared with existing approaches, namely stochastic gradient descent with momentum (SGDM), adaptive momentum estimation (ADAM), the original cuckoo search algorithm (CSA), Caputo fractional gradient descent (CFGD), beetle antenna search with ADAM (BASADAM), and CSA with ADAM (CSA-ADAM). Evaluation criteria encompass accuracy, robustness, consistency, and convergence speed. Comparative results highlight significant enhancements across all metrics, showcasing the potential of deep learning techniques with the proposed optimizer for accurately identifying ocular tumors. This research contributes significantly to the development of computer-aided diagnosis systems for ocular tumors, emphasizing the benefits of the proposed optimizer in medical image classification domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.