ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Detection of renal cell hydronephrosis in ultrasound kidney images: a study on the efficacy of deep convolutional neural networks.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic transfer learning and adversarial networks for breast cancer diagnosis: benign vs. invasive classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel deep reinforcement learning based collision avoidance approach for path planning of robots in unknown environment.PloS one · 2025Article
- Deep learning in renal ultrasound: applications, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Identification of kidney stones in KUB X-ray images using VGG16 empowered with explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Innovative road distress detection (IR-DD): an efficient and scalable deep learning approach.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the realm of medical imaging, the early detection of kidney issues, particularly renal cell hydronephrosis, holds immense importance. Traditionally, the identification of such conditions within ultrasound images has relied on manual analysis, a labor-intensive and error-prone process. However, in recent years, the emergence of deep learning-based algorithms has paved the way for automation in this domain. This study aims to harness the power of deep learning models to autonomously detect renal cell hydronephrosis in ultrasound images taken in close proximity to the kidneys. State-of-the-art architectures, including VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, and the innovative Novel DCNN, were put to the test and subjected to rigorous comparisons. The performance of each model was meticulously evaluated, employing metrics such as F1 score, accuracy, precision, and recall. The results paint a compelling picture. The Novel DCNN model outshines its peers, boasting an impressive accuracy rate of 99.8%. In the same arena, InceptionV3 achieved a notable 90% accuracy, ResNet50 secured 89%, and VGG16 reached 85%. These outcomes underscore the Novel DCNN's prowess in the realm of renal cell hydronephrosis detection within ultrasound images. Moreover, this study offers a detailed view of each model's performance through confusion matrices, shedding light on their abilities to categorize true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. In this regard, the Novel DCNN model exhibits remarkable proficiency, minimizing both false positives and false negatives. In conclusion, this research underscores the Novel DCNN model's supremacy in automating the detection of renal cell hydronephrosis in ultrasound images. With its exceptional accuracy and minimal error rates, this model stands as a promising tool for healthcare professionals, facilitating early-stage diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, the model's convergence rate and accuracy hold potential for enhancement through further exploration, including testing on larger and more diverse datasets and investigating diverse optimization strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.