Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669423›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024

Clinical and high-resolution manometry of 801 patients with esophageal dysmotility, including achalasia, in relation to age.

Uday C Ghoshal, Akshay Kulkarni, Vivek V Shirol, Anshuman Elhence, Bushra Fatima, Anand P Agrahari, Asha Misra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Uday C GhoshalDepartment of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-8495
Akshay KulkarniDepartment of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India.
Vivek V ShirolDepartment of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India.
Anshuman ElhenceDepartment of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India.
Bushra FatimaDepartment of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India.
Anand P AgrahariDepartment of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India.
Asha MisraDepartment of Gastroenterology Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Spectrum of esophageal motility disorders may differ according to age, but studies on this are scanty, contradictory, and included small number of patients. Accordingly, we retrospectively analyzed data of a large sample of patients to study the spectrum of esophageal motility disorders in relation to age, and to evaluate the clinical profile and high-resolution manometry parameters and achalasia subtypes according to Chicago IV criteria. Methods: Of 909 patients evaluated by high-resolution water perfusion or solid-state manometry during a 3-year period, data on 801 were finally analyzed. Results: Achalasia cardia was the commonest motility disorder of esophagus in this large study and type II was the commonest subtype. There was no difference in clinical and manometry parameters among elderly patients as compared to younger patients with achalasia. Type I achalasia patients less often had chest pain and tended to have nocturnal coughing spells more often, and patients with achalasia experiencing chest pain tended to have higher distal contractile integral (DCI) than those not having pain irrespective of age. Conclusion: The clinical and high-resolution manometry parameters among young and elderly patients with esophageal motility disorders are quite comparable. However, these differed in relation to achalasia subtypes and symptoms. Type I achalasia patients less often had chest pain and those experiencing chest pain tended to have higher DCI values than those not having pain irrespective of age.

Indexed as

chest painChicago classificationelderlyesophageal manometrymotor dysphagia

Identifiers

PMID39669423
PMCPMC11635386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.