ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Optimizing nitrogen removal in advanced wastewater treatment using biological aerated filters.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of dissolved oxygen distribution effects on nitrogen removal efficiency in oxidation ditch systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reducing total nitrogen (TN) presents a significant challenge for numerous wastewater treatment facilities. In order to address this issue, the current study employed a biological aerated filter for the treatment of wastewater containing low nitrogen concentrations. Both lab-scale and pilot-scale biofilters were constructed to investigate the denitrification performance and maximum denitrification load. The findings indicated that the anaerobic denitrification process of established biofilm adhered to pseudo-first-order kinetics. The results of batch testing and continuous-flow experiments confirmed that the minimum hydraulic retention time (HRT) required for mature biofilm was determined to be 0.5 h. The optimal operating parameters were found to be as follows: influent NO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.