ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Design and evaluation of a ball spline wasp-inspired needle.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Steering strategies for wasp inspired self propelled needles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Design and evaluation of a mechanical pencil-based actuator for a wasp-inspired needle.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In percutaneous interventions, needles are used to reach target locations inside the body. However, when the needle is pushed through the tissue, forces arise at the needle tip and along the needle body, making the needle prone to buckling. Recently, needles that prevent buckling inspired by the ovipositor of female parasitic wasps have been developed. Building on these needle designs, this study proposes a manual actuation unit that allows the operator to drive the wasp-inspired needle through stationary tissue. The needle consists of six 0.3-mm spring steel wires, of which one is advanced while the others are retracted. The advancing needle segment has to overcome a cutting and friction force while the retracting ones experience a friction force in the opposite direction. The actuation unit moves the needle segments in the required sequence using a low-friction ball spline mechanism. The moving components of the needle have low inertia, and its connection to the actuation unit using a ball spline introduces a small friction force, generating a small push force on the needle that facilitates the needle's propulsion into tissue while preventing needle buckling. Experimental testing evaluated the needle's ability to move through stationary 15-wt% gelatin tissue phantoms for different actuation velocities. It was found that the needle moved through the tissue phantoms with mean slip ratios of 0.35, 0.31, and 0.29 for actuation velocities of π, 2π, and 3π rad/s, respectively. Furthermore, evaluation in 15-wt%, 10-wt%, and 5-wt% gelatin tissue phantoms showed that decreasing the gelatin concentration decreased the mean slip ratios from 0.35 to 0.19 and 0.18, respectively. The needle actuation system design is a step forward in developing a wasp-inspired needle for percutaneous procedures that prevents buckling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.