Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669400›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2024

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus: a comparison of instruments and associations with patient-reported outcomes using an electronic patient-reported outcome survey in Europe.

Murilo Guedes, Charlotte Tu, Nidhi Sukul, Elham Asgari, Fitsum Guebre-Egziabher, Despina Ruessmann, Thilo Schaufler, Hugh Rayner, Michel Jadoul, Laura Labriola and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Longitudinal Trajectories of CKD-Associated Pruritus.Kidney international reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Murilo GuedesArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, USA.
Charlotte TuArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, USA.
Nidhi SukulDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Elham AsgariDepartment of Nephrology, Guy's, St Thomas Hospital, London, UK.
Fitsum Guebre-EgziabherService de Nephrologie, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM U1060 université Lyon-1, Lyon, France.
Despina RuessmannCSL-Vifor, Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
Thilo SchauflerCSL-Vifor, Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
Hugh RaynerBirmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Michel JadoulDepartment of Nephrology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Laura LabriolaDepartment of Nephrology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Roberto Pecoits-FilhoArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, USA.
Ronald L PisoniArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, USA.
Angelo KaraboyasArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The associations between self-reported chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been reported using various instruments to assess itch. Data collection via multiple CKD-aP instruments allows the evaluation of different domains and measurements of CKD-aP burden and may help tailor data capture for future research or clinical care. Methods: An electronic PRO (ePRO) survey was distributed to European hemodialysis (HD) patients enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) in 2021-23. The DOPPS is an international cohort study that aims to investigate practice patterns and outcomes in HD patients. The ePRO survey included multiple CKD-aP instruments: Average Itch and Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scales (AI-NRS, WI-NRS) and a Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL)-36 single question. Linear and logistic regression were used to estimate adjusted associations between CKD-aP instruments and various PROs. Results: This analysis included 769 patients who completed the WI-NRS from HD facilities in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the UK. The correlation between WI-NRS and the KDQOL-36 itch question was 0.88 overall and 0.46 among patients at least somewhat bothered by itch. Mean WI-NRS scores stratified by response to the KDQOL-36 itch question were 8.1, 6.4, 4.1 and 3.1 for extremely, very much, moderately and somewhat bothered, respectively. Patients with worse WI-NRS scores reported worse sleep quality, greater fatigue, more depressive symptoms, and lower mental and physical quality of life; these associations were similar to those observed for the KDQOL-36 itch question. Conclusion: Correlation between CKD-aP instruments was high overall, but moderate among the subgroup of patients bothered by itch; differences can be partially attributed to the recall period for the KDQOL-36 (4 weeks) vs the AI- and WI-NRS (24 h). The consistent associations of these instruments with poor outcomes underscores the importance to identify and effectively treat HD patients suffering from pruritus.

Indexed as

hemodialysispatient-reported outcomespruritus

Identifiers

PMID39669400
PMCPMC11635370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.