Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669392›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Digital empowerment in long-term condition management: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the experiences and perceptions of home-based digital health coaching interventions.

Rachel Christie, Euan Sadler, Matthew Sait, Karen Light, Chantel Cox, Michele Board, Sarah Thomas, Dawn-Marie Walker, Mark Allen-Pick, Katherine Bradbury and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rachel ChristieFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3071-3259
Euan SadlerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-224X
Matthew SaitFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Karen LightFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Chantel CoxFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Michele BoardFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Sarah ThomasFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9501-9091
Dawn-Marie WalkerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Mark Allen-PickFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Katherine BradburySchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jane MurphyFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-5566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Globally, the prevalence of long-term conditions (LTCs) continues to rise. The impact of LTCs presents significant challenges for international health and social care systems and continues to be a leading cause of mortality. Despite this, digital health coaching interventions (DHCIs) appear to be a promising strategy for managing chronic disease. The aims of this systematic review and narrative synthesis were to explore the barriers and enablers for the use of DHCIs and to gather valuable information to inform the development of a new DHCI for LTC management. Methods: Six major databases were searched for studies published in the English language between January 2012 and December 2022. Qualitative and mixed methods studies were included if there was an intervention of digital health coaching alongside the use of a digital component. Interventions were suitable if completed in community settings, amongst adults aged over 18 with a LTC, or amongst informal carers, health coaches, or health and care professionals. Included studies were assessed for quality, and results were analysed with narrative synthesis. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, covering a range of LTCs and interventions which included digital health coaching (telephone, video, online, text) and the use of a digital component (online, application-based). Results showed that DHCIs require personalisation and feedback, and cannot be overcomplex. Importantly, an element of human connection is favourable. Conclusions: The acceptability of DHCIs is variable- and context-dependent. Further research is needed to focus on the breadth of LTCs in order to generalise findings.

Indexed as

Ageingchronic diseasedigital healthhealth coachinglong-term conditions

Identifiers

PMID39669392
PMCPMC11635859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.