ArticleHeliyon2024
Innovative approach towards early prediction of ovarian cancer: Machine learning- enabled XAI techniques.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative bioinformatics approaches for early detection biomarkers in ovarian cancer.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Multimodal AI in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: integrated prediction and clinical decision-making.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer: advancing in precision diagnosis and clinical management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Leveraging machine learning models to evaluate immune infiltration in the ovarian cancer microenvironment: a single-cell analysis approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Explainable AI in early autism detection: a literature review of interpretable machine learning approaches.Discover mental health · 2025Review
- Machine learning in ovarian cancer: a bibliometric and visual analysis from 2004 to 2024.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Prediction of Early Diagnosis in Ovarian Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning Approaches with Boruta and Advanced Feature Selection.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting early postoperative complications after radical gastrectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Explainable AI-based feature importance analysis for ovarian cancer classification with ensemble methods.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, ovarian cancer affects women disproportionately, causing significant morbidity and mortality rates. The early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is necessary for enhancing patient health and survival rates. This research article explores the utilization of Machine Learning (ML) techniques alongside eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methodologies to aid in the early detection of ovarian cancer. ML techniques have recently gained popularity in developing predictive models to detect early-stage ovarian cancer. These predictions are made using XAI in a transparent and understandable way for healthcare professionals and patients. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of various ovarian cancer prediction methodologies. This includes assessing K Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, Decision trees, and ensemble learning techniques such as Max Voting, Boosting, Bagging, and Stacking. A dataset of 349 patients with known ovarian cancer status was collected from Kaggle. The dataset included a comprehensive range of clinical features such as age, family history, tumor markers, and imaging characteristics. Preprocessing techniques were applied to enhance input data, including feature scaling and dimensionality reduction. A Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR) algorithm was used to select the features in the model. Our experimental results demonstrate that in Support Vector Machines, we found 85 % base model accuracy and 89 % accuracy after stacking several ensemble learning techniques. With the help of XAI, complex ML algorithms can be given more profound insights into their decision-making, improving their applicability. This paper aims to introduce the best practices for integrating ML and artificial intelligence in biomarker evaluation. Building and evaluating Shapley values-based classifiers and visualizing results were the focus of our investigation. The study contributes to the field of oncology and women's health by offering a promising approach to the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.