Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669348›Full record

ArticleJTCVS techniques2024

Robotic repair of atrial septal defect: Pre-groove vertical right atriotomy approach.

Kitae Kim, Yun Seok Kim, Hong Rae Kim, Ho Jin Kim, Jae Suk Yoo, Joon Bum Kim, Sung-Ho Jung, Jae Won Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kitae KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yun Seok KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Keimyung Medical Center, University of Keimyung College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Hong Rae KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ho Jin KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae Suk YooDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Joon Bum KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sung-Ho JungDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae Won LeeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Minimally invasive repair using robotic systems has been accepted as an attractive alternative in the surgical repair of atrial septal defects (ASDs). Clear exposure of the entire rim of the ASD is often hindered during a robotic approach. Here, we describe an approach using vertical right atriotomy along the interatrial groove that may enhance the exposure of the ASD. Methods: Patients who underwent ASD closure using the da Vinci Si surgical ystem (Intuitive Surgical) from 2007 to 2021 were included. During ASD closure procedures, right atriotomy was performed either conventionally in an oblique manner or parallel to the interatrial groove. A comparative analysis was performed in terms of all-cause mortality, complications, and durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic crossclamp, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. The inverse probability of treatment weighting was utilized to balance baseline characteristics across different surgical approaches. Results: A total of 114 consecutive patients (mean age, 38.7 ± 12.8 years) constituted the study cohort. There were no cases of mortality or surgical complications in either group. After adjusting for potential covariates, the cardiopulmonary bypass (92.8 ± 31.5 minutes vs 143.1 ± 40.7 minutes) and aortic crossclamp (30.7 ± 21.3 minutes vs 60.8 ± 23.5 minutes) times were significantly shorter in the group using vertical right atriotomy than in the group using conventional approach ( Conclusions: Performing vertical right atriotomy adjacent to the interatrial groove optimized ASD exposure compared with the conventional approach during robotic ASD repair, leading to reduced cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic crossclamp times.

Indexed as

atrial septal defectinteratrial grooveright atriotomyrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39669348
PMCPMC11632338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.