ArticleJTCVS techniques2024
Robotic repair of atrial septal defect: Pre-groove vertical right atriotomy approach.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of Da Vinci robot-assisted atrial septal defect repair in patients with different body mass index levels: a single-center retrospective analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Atrial Septal Defect Patch Closure From the Left Atrial Side Approach in Totally Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Minimally invasive repair using robotic systems has been accepted as an attractive alternative in the surgical repair of atrial septal defects (ASDs). Clear exposure of the entire rim of the ASD is often hindered during a robotic approach. Here, we describe an approach using vertical right atriotomy along the interatrial groove that may enhance the exposure of the ASD. Methods: Patients who underwent ASD closure using the da Vinci Si surgical ystem (Intuitive Surgical) from 2007 to 2021 were included. During ASD closure procedures, right atriotomy was performed either conventionally in an oblique manner or parallel to the interatrial groove. A comparative analysis was performed in terms of all-cause mortality, complications, and durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic crossclamp, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. The inverse probability of treatment weighting was utilized to balance baseline characteristics across different surgical approaches. Results: A total of 114 consecutive patients (mean age, 38.7 ± 12.8 years) constituted the study cohort. There were no cases of mortality or surgical complications in either group. After adjusting for potential covariates, the cardiopulmonary bypass (92.8 ± 31.5 minutes vs 143.1 ± 40.7 minutes) and aortic crossclamp (30.7 ± 21.3 minutes vs 60.8 ± 23.5 minutes) times were significantly shorter in the group using vertical right atriotomy than in the group using conventional approach ( Conclusions: Performing vertical right atriotomy adjacent to the interatrial groove optimized ASD exposure compared with the conventional approach during robotic ASD repair, leading to reduced cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic crossclamp times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.