Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669299›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Automated Detection of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Using OCT Imaging via Explainable Deep Learning.

Ansgar Beuse, Daniel Alexander Wenzel, Martin Stephan Spitzer, Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Maximilian Schultheiss, Sven Poli, Carsten Grohmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Atrial fibrillation in Retinal Artery Occlusions.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ansgar BeuseDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Daniel Alexander WenzelUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Martin Stephan SpitzerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Karl Ulrich Bartz-SchmidtUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Maximilian SchultheissDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sven PoliDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Carsten GrohmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate the capability of a deep learning model to detect central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), a retinal pathology with significant clinical urgency, using OCT data. Design: Retrospective, external validation study analyzing OCT and clinical baseline data of 2 institutions via deep learning classification analysis. Subjects: Patients presenting to the University Medical Center Tübingen and the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany. Methods: OCT data of patients suffering from CRAO, differential diagnosis with (sub) acute visual loss (central retinal vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema, nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy), and from controls were expertly graded and distinguished into 3 groups. Our methodological approach involved a nested multiclass five fold cross-validation classification scheme. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the curve (AUC). Results: The optimal performance of our algorithm was observed using 30 epochs, complemented by an early stopping mechanism to prevent overfitting. Our model followed a multiclass approach, distinguishing among the 3 different classes: control, CRAO, and differential diagnoses. The evaluation was conducted by the "one vs. all" area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) method. The results demonstrated AUC of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], ± 0.01); 0.99 (95% CI, ± 0.00); and 0.90 (95% CI, ± 0.03) for each class, respectively. Conclusions: Our machine learning algorithm (MLA) exhibited a high AUC, as well as sensitivity and specificity in detecting CRAO and the differential classes, respectively. These findings underscore the potential for deploying MLAs in the identification of less common etiologies within an acute emergency clinical setting. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

AI OCTCRAODeep learning retinaOCT imagingOphthalmology deep learning

Identifiers

PMID39669299
PMCPMC11634984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.