Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669260›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine open2023

Exploring current challenges in the technologist workforce of clinical genomics laboratories.

Yassmine Akkari, Sheila Dobin, Robert G Best, Marco L Leung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yassmine AkkariThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Sheila DobinDepartment of Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Health - Temple Medical Center, Temple, TX.
Robert G BestThe University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC.
Marco L LeungThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Workforce shortages are observed in many sectors of the economy, including clinical genomics laboratories. Although medical technologists are essential for the primary functions of laboratory operations and many institutions in the United States have reported acute staff shortages, we are unaware of any recent studies that provide concrete data detailing workforce needs. In this report, we summarize the results of a technologist-based survey sent to clinical laboratory directors across the United States. Methods: The survey was designed to provide detailed and objective evidence on the current landscape of the technologist workforce in clinical cytogenetics, molecular genetics, and laboratories that have combined both disciplines. Survey questions included demographics, salaries across career stages, retention trends, and hiring requirements and challenges. Results: Analysis of the survey data from 70 US-based submissions showed that cytogenetics laboratories had higher proportion of unfilled technologist positions, whereas molecular laboratories had more applications for each open positions. The technologist retention rate in molecular laboratories was higher than that in cytogenetics. The lack of adequately trained applicants and competitive salary offers by other laboratories were cited as top barriers for filling technologist positions. Conclusion: The results from this survey will serve as normative data in generating solutions to address acute workforce needs in the United States.

Indexed as

CytogeneticsEducationLaboratory technologistsMolecular GeneticsWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID39669260
PMCPMC11613654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.