ArticleGenetics in medicine open2023
Publicly funded exome sequencing for outpatients with neurodevelopmental disorders demonstrates a high rate of unexpected findings impacting medical management.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Exome sequencing (ES) is a powerful tool that facilitates the diagnosis of patients with rare Mendelian syndromes. In 2018 the Israeli Ministry of Health initiated a national pilot program that funds ES for outpatients with global developmental delay (GDD). Here, we describe the 3-year impact of this program on patient care in a single tertiary hospital. Methods: From 2018 to 2020, trio ES was performed on 170 participants fulfilling Israeli Ministry of Health criteria: (1) moderate to severe GDD and (2) mild GDD with epilepsy or a major congenital anomaly. We retrospectively analyzed this cohort. Results: A diagnosis was achieved in 74 individuals (43%). There were 82 clinically significant variants, the majority being novel. Consanguinity was reported in 22% and was not associated with a higher diagnostic rate. The presence of autism spectrum was associated with a lower diagnostic rate of 8/33 (24%). Autosomal dominant inheritance was identified in 14% of participants, and the parental phenotype ranged between fully affected and asymptomatic. Among the diagnosed participants, 16% had an unexpected diagnosis that did not fit the typical clinical presentation. In 9%, the diagnosis changed short-term active clinical management, in 19%, the surveillance recommendations, and in 23%, the family-focused outcomes. Conclusion: The introduction of a national program that funds ES for GDD has transformed patient care, leading to a significant effect on medical management and treatment. The high rate of an unexpected inheritance mode and variable phenotypes emphasizes the diagnostic complexity of neurodevelopmental disorders and the strength of a non-targeted approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.