ArticleGenetics in medicine open2023
A pooled electronic consultation program to improve access to genetics specialists.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the science of genomic learning healthcare systems.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Assessing the Utilization of Electronic Consultations in Genetics: Seven-Year Retrospective Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Breaking barriers: fostering equitable access to pediatric genomics through innovative care models and technologies.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Processes and outcomes from a clinical genetics e-consultation service managed by a primary care physician champion.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Given limited ambulatory access to genetics specialists, innovative service delivery solutions are needed. Electronic consultation (e-consult) programs are growing to connect clinicians to specialists. We explored the utilization and outcomes of a genetics and genomics e-consult program at Massachusetts General Hospital system in its first year. Methods: A retrospective observational analysis of genetics e-consults ordered between April 2021 and March 2022. Results: In its first year, the e-consult service triaged 153 requests and completed 122 in a median of 2.0 days. Of the 97 e-consults with actionable recommendations, there was documentation that most ordering clinicians followed through (82%). A variety of providers used the service, though the majority (77%) were generalists. Conclusion: e-Consult models should be considered as one way to increase access to genetics expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.