ReviewGenetics in medicine open2023
New insights in efficacy of different ERT dosages in Fabry disease: Switch and switch-back studies data following agalsidase beta shortage. Update of systematic review.
Review in Genetics in medicine open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fabry disease cardiomyopathy: A state-of-the-art review.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesPooled it
- Fabry Disease: An Updated Perspective and Review of Treatment and Therapies.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Fabry Disease: A Focus on the Role of Oxidative Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2016, a systematic review and a meta-analysis of existing data on the effects of switch from agalsidase beta to alfa in patients with Fabry disease showed that the switch was well tolerated and associated with stable disease progression. However, additional evidence that supports the need for an update of the review on the long-term effects of switching to agalsidase alfa, with a mention on the effects of reswitch to agalsidase beta, has emerged. Relevant papers were identified on PubMed, Cochrane, ISI Web, and Scopus databases from September 2015 to December 2021. Analyzed parameters were clinical events, changes in organ function or structure, disease related symptoms, lyso-globotriasolylceramide 3 (lyso-Gb3) plasma levels, presence of antidrug antibodies, and adverse effects. In total, 15 publications were evaluated, with a total of 353 subjects. The results of the review confirmed some points of the previous analysis with some new important information. After the switch from agalsidase beta to alfa, an increased number of clinical events, a significant loss of renal function, and an increase in lyso-Gb3 levels were reported; conversely, lyso-Gb3 levels decreased after the switch from agalsidase alfa to beta. The results confirm the importance of dose and recommend that patients be monitored through intensified surveillance, including lyso-Gb3 levels every 6 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.