ArticleApplied network science2024
Bayesian hierarchical network autocorrelation models for estimating direct and indirect effects of peer hospitals on outcomes of hospitalized patients.
Article in Applied network science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Network Modeling of Environmental, Social, and Behavioral Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease Risk.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Developing and Comparing Four Families of Bayesian Network Autocorrelation Models for Binary Outcomes: Estimating Peer Effects Involving Adoption of Medical Technologies.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Article
- Influence of multiple network structures on bayesian estimation of peer effects and statistical power for generalized linear network autocorrelation models.Applied network science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When an hypothesized peer effect (also termed social influence or contagion) is believed to act between units (e.g., hospitals) above the level at which data is observed (e.g., patients), a network autocorrelation model may be embedded within a hierarchical data structure thereby formulating the peer effect as a dependency between latent variables. In such a situation, a patient's own hospital can be thought of as a mediator between the effects of peer hospitals and their outcome. However, as in mediation analyses, there may be interest in allowing the effects of peer units to directly impact patients of other units. To accommodate these possibilities, we develop two hierarchical network autocorrelation models that allow for direct and indirect peer effects between hospitals when modeling individual outcomes of the patients cared for at the hospitals. A Bayesian approach is used for model estimation while a simulation study assesses the performance of the models and sensitivity of results to different prior distributions. We construct a United States New England region patient-sharing hospital network and apply newly developed Bayesian hierarchical models to study the diffusion of robotic surgery and hospital peer effects in patient outcomes using a cohort of United States Medicare beneficiaries in 2016 and 2017. The comparative fit of models to the data is assessed using Deviance information criteria tailored to hierarchical models that include peer effects as latent variables. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41109-024-00627-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.