Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669129›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Take it sitting down: the effect of body posture on cortical potentials during free viewing-A mobile EEG recording study.

Vicente Soto, John Tyson-Carr, Katerina Kokmotou, Hannah Roberts, Adam Byrne, Danielle Hewitt, Nicholas Fallon, Timo Giesbrecht, Andrej Stancak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vicente SotoDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
John Tyson-CarrDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Katerina KokmotouDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Hannah RobertsDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Adam ByrneDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Danielle HewittDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Nicholas FallonDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Timo GiesbrechtUnilever Research and Development Port Sunlight Laboratory, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Andrej StancakDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain imaging performed in natural settings is known as mobile brain and body imaging (MoBI). One of the features which distinguishes MoBI and laboratory-based experiments is the body posture. Previous studies pointed to mechanical, autonomic, cortical and cognitive differences between upright stance and sitting or reclining. The purpose of this study was to analyse effects of posture on eye-movement related potentials (EMRP) recorded during free viewing of human faces. A 64-channel wireless EEG was recorded from 14 participants in either standing or reclining postures while they freely viewed pictures of emotional faces displaying fear, anger, sadness, and a neutral emotional state. Eye tracking data was used to insert triggers corresponding to the instant at which the gaze first landed on a face. Spatial filtering of the EEG data was performed using a group independent component analysis (ICA). Grand average EMRPs displayed the post-saccadic lambda component and the face-sensitive N170/vertex positive potential (VPP) complex. The lambda component but not the N170 component was stronger during reclining than upright posture. Emotional expression of faces showed no effects on EMRP components or subjective ratings. Results suggest that posture primarily affects early components of EMRPs recorded using wireless EEG recordings during free viewing of faces. Thus, findings from evoked potential data obtained in seated individuals, e.g., in laboratory experiments, should be interpreted with caution in MoBI experiments with posture affecting primarily the early latency component.

Indexed as

body postureEEGeye-movement related potentialsmobile brain imagingN170

Identifiers

PMID39669129
PMCPMC11634799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.