Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669113›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Enhancing Familiarity and Utility: A Pre-Post Survey Study on Mental Practice Workshop Outcomes.

Carlos Hölzing, Benjamin Gordon, Patrick Meybohm, Nadia Spitznagel, Stephen Hearns, Oliver Happel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos HölzingDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-6544
Benjamin GordonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Patrick MeybohmDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Nadia SpitznagelKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Palliativ- und Schmerzmedizin, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Stephen HearnsScotSTARHangar B, Emergency Medical Retrieval Service, Paisley, UK.
Oliver HappelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7320-8521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMental practice, a cognitive technique for practicing skills without physical movement, holds promise for enhancing clinical outcomes in emergency medicine. This study investigates its recognition and the impact of a basic workshop on emergency physicians' attitudes toward mental practice.

methodsThis pre-post survey study involved 20 medical professionals who participated in a 2-day workshop. Assessments were conducted before and after the intervention using a structured questionnaire.

resultsInitial findings revealed that 65% of participants were aware of mental practice, and only 10% utilized it in clinical settings. Postworkshop, familiarity, and perceived helpfulness significantly increased from 2.2 to 4.1 and 3.9 to 4.7, respectively, with marked improvements in confidence and the intention to apply these techniques clinically by 100% of the participants.

conclusionThe results suggest that brief educational interventions can substantially influence medical professionals' engagement with mental practice, advocating its inclusion in medical training curricula to enhance procedural skills and patient care.

Indexed as

clinical competencecognitionmedical educationpsychological stress

Identifiers

PMID39669113
PMCPMC11635951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.