Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669100›Full record

ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2025

Automated Image Clarity Detection for the Improvement of Colposcopy Imaging with Multiple Devices.

Lillian Ekem, Erica Skerrett, Megan J Huchko, Nimmi Ramanujam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lillian EkemDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Erica SkerrettDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Megan J HuchkoCenter for Global Reproductive Health, Duke Global Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Nimmi RamanujamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Funding

Development and Validation of an Artificial-Intelligence-enabled Portable Colposcopy Device for Optimizing Triage Alternatives for HPV-based Cervical Cancer ScreeningU01CA269192 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Megan J. Huchko, Francesca Akoth Odhiambo · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
Novel see and treat strategies for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settingsR01CA239268 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, DAVID FRANK, RAMANUJAM, NIRMALA · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Innovations in cervical cancer diagnosis for low resource settings using advanced optical imaging and machine learning diagnostic algorithms.R44CA240019 · NCI · CALLA HEALTH FOUNDATION · PI KRIEGER, MARLEE, RAMANUJAM, NIRMALA · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239268NCI NIH HHS R44 CA240019NCI NIH HHS U01 CA269192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proportion of women dying from cervical cancer in middle- and low-income countries is over 60%, twice that of their high-income counterparts. A primary screening strategy to eliminate this burden is cervix visualization and application of 3-5% acetic acid, inducing contrast in potential lesions. Recently, machine learning tools have emerged to aid visual diagnosis. As low-cost visualization tools expand, it is important to maximize image quality at the time of the exam or of images used in algorithms.

objectiveWe present the use of an object detection algorithm, the YOLOv5 model, to localize the cervix and describe blur within a multi-device image database.

methodsWe took advantage of the Fourier domain to provide pseudo-labeling of training and testing images. A YOLOv5 model was trained using Pocket Colposcope, Mobile ODT EVA, and standard of care digital colposcope images.

resultsWhen tested on all devices, this model achieved a mean average precision score, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.9, 0.89, and 0.89, respectively. Mobile ODT EVA and Pocket Colposcope hold out sets yielded mAP score of 0.81 and 0.83, respectively, reflecting the generalizability of the algorithm. Compared to physician annotation, it yielded an accuracy of 0.72.

conclusionThis method provides an informed quantitative, generalizable analysis of captured images that is highly concordant with expert annotation. SIGNIFICANCE: This quality control framework can assist in the standardization of colposcopy workflow, data acquisition, and image analysis and in doing so increase the availability of usable positive images for the development of deep learning algorithms.

Identifiers

PMID39669100
PMCPMC11633643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.