ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2024
A Study on Outcome of Conservative Management of Shaft Humerus Fracture: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Conservative or surgical treatment options are available for humeral shaft fractures. To pinpoint individuals who would benefit from early surgical fixation, fracture characteristics were examined. In conservative treatment, the "U" slab prevents displacement, and overriding is corrected by gravity while the patient continues to move about. Rotation is prohibited for 14 days by holding the arm immobile to the chest with the elbow flexed. The preferred course of treatment for fractures of the humeral shaft at all levels is the hanging cast. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at Eras Lucknow Medical College and Hospital. Forty patients with Humerus shaft fractures (HSF) who met the inclusion criteria and presented in casualty or outpatient department participated in the study. This prospective cross-sectional study was of 24 months duration. Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to calculate the mean with corresponding standard deviations (s.d.). Test of proportion was used to find the standard normal deviate (Z) to compare the difference. Results: The ratio of male and female (Male: Female) was 3:1. Test of proportion showed that the proportion of males (75.0%) was significantly higher than that of females (25.0%) (Z = 7.07; P < 0.001). Thus, in this study, the males were at higher risk of having fracture shaft of humerus than females. Right-sided fractures (57.5%) were significantly higher than left-sided fractures (42.5%) (Z = 2.12; P = 0.034). About 72.5% of the patients were with disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score between 14 and 16 which was significantly higher than other DASH scores (Z = 3.30; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Our observation regarding this study is that conservative management of HSF can be opted as the most effective way of treatment, and any complications due to any untoward event during the operative treatment should be limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.