ArticleSM radiology journal2024
Needle Guide Friction Reduction Utilizing Contact Surface Structure.
Article in SM radiology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer ranks as the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality among males. A template guided core biopsy procedure is an essential component of prostate cancer diagnosis. Various factors influence the quality of the histological sample that is produced from the biopsy, including tissue fragmentation, needle insertion speed, needle deflection, and sheath cutting speed. In instances where a biopsy core fails to meet established clinical standards, an additional core extraction is necessary, resulting in heightened patient discomfort and an increased risk of infection. The objective of this study is to examine alternative configurations for the needle guide in order to optimize for the reduction of needle guide frictional forces while providing adequate guidance towards a target. A simulation of this interaction using different configurations of the needle guide was designed using SIMULA Abaqus, and a Finite Element Analysis was performed to observe the friction force between the needle and guide. The results showed that configurations with contact points oriented parallel to the direction of insertion exhibited the least recorded frictional forces. The study demonstrated that configurations which provided decreased contact surface compared to the control needle guide resulted in lower friction force. These findings advocate for the optimization of the conventional biopsy needle guide to reduce the contact area between the needle and guide inner surface, potentially reducing the number of passes required to obtain a histologically viable core specimen and mitigating the risk of patient infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39669008PMC11634242What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.