ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2024
The pH-dependence of efflux ratios determined with bidirectional transport assays across cellular monolayers.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MDCK/Caco-2 assays serve as essential in vitro tools for evaluating membrane permeability and active transport, especially mediated by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Despite their utility, challenges remain in quantifying active transport and using the efflux ratio (ER) to determine intrinsic values for active efflux. Such an intrinsic value for P-gp facilitated efflux necessitates knowing whether this transporter transports the neutral or ionic species of a compound. Utilising MDCK-MDR1 assays, we investigate a method for determining transporter substrate fraction preference by studying ER pH-dependence for basic, acidic and non-dissociating compounds. These results are compared with model fits based on various assumptions of transporter species preference. As an unexpected consequence of these assays, we also give evidence for an additional influx transporter at the basolateral membrane, and further extend our model to incorporate this transport. The combined influences of paracellular transport, the previously unaccounted for basolateral influx transporter, as well as potential pH effects on the transporter impedes the extraction of intrinsic values for active transport from the ER. Furthermore, we determined that using inhibitor affects the measurement of paracellular transport. While clear indications of transporter species preference remain elusive, this study enhances understanding of the MDCK system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.