Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668974›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2024

A New Clinical Test to Evaluate Intrinsic Foot Muscle Function.

Megna Panchbhavi, Michael C Poliner, Patrick M Finegan, Daniel C Jupiter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megna PanchbhaviUniversity of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4083-2912
Michael C PolinerCollege of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Patrick M FineganDepartment of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Daniel C JupiterDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-0473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intrinsic foot muscle weakness has been implicated in a wide range of forefoot conditions and is typically measured by the paper grip test. The proposed "knuckle test" is intended to evaluate intrinsic foot muscle function, in which active flexion of toes makes the metatarsal heads ("knuckles") prominent in the forefoot. This study seeks to compare prevalence of negative knuckle test results and intrinsic muscle weakness in patients, primarily by association with a positive paper grip test result and secondarily with presence of toe deformities. Methods: Ninety-eight patients, 55 with toe deformity and 43 without, were evaluated for ability to flex their toes to the extent of knuckle prominence (knuckle test) and grip paper on the ground with their toes (paper grip test). Variables were compared between those with positive and negative knuckle test results. Results: A negative knuckle test result is significantly associated with the inability to grip a paper strip ( Conclusion: Given that the paper grip test outcomes are a well-established sign of intrinsic muscle weakness, the significant association between knuckle and paper grip test outcomes substantiates the use of the knuckle test to detect intrinsic muscle weakness. The knuckle test is a potentially quick, simple, and cost-effective clinical maneuver to indicate intrinsic foot muscle weakness in a patient. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic test development.

Indexed as

footfoot deformitiesmuscle functionmuscle weaknessoutcome measures

Identifiers

PMID39668974
PMCPMC11635877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.