Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668947›Full record

ReviewCurrent developments in nutrition2024

Bread Consumption and Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Glenn A Gaesser, Siddhartha S Angadi, Craig Paterson, Julie Miller Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current developments in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Glenn A GaesserCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Siddhartha S AngadiDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Craig PatersonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Julie Miller JonesDepartment of Family, Consumer, and Nutritional Science, St. Catherine University, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because bread can contain potential carcinogens such as acrylamide, and is widely consumed, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether bread consumption is associated with increased cancer risk. PubMed and Medline databases were searched up to 1 March 2024, for studies that provided hazard ratios (HRs) (or similar) for bread consumption and cancer incidence or mortality. Only prospective cohort studies were included. We used the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Meta-analysis was performed with Cochrane's RevMan 5.4.1 software using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane's

Indexed as

acrylamidebaked goodsdietgrain foodsgrainsrefined grainwhole-grain

Identifiers

PMID39668947
PMCPMC11634998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.