ReviewIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
Telemedicine-Enabled Otoscopes as Catalysts for Accessible and Preventive Ear Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maintaining optimal hearing health and preventing ear infections is crucial across all life stages, spanning from before birth and infancy to middle age and beyond. The primary aim of the research was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the telemedicine-enabled otoscope (TEO) in diagnosing ear diseases with that of the conventional otoscope. Materials and Methods: The databases PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were thoroughly searched to find original studies on TEO at the community as well as hospital levels along with meta-analysis for comparison with standard diagnostic methods using traditional otoscopes. Results: The telemedicine-equipped otoscope displays a sensitivity of 82% (confidence interval 0.78-0.95) and a specificity of 95% (confidence interval 0.93-0.96). When employed by physicians, the combined sensitivity and specificity become 84% (confidence interval 0.79-0.88) and 91% (confidence interval 0.87-0.94), respectively. Community Health Workers (CHWs) using telemedicine-enabled otoscopes exhibit a collective sensitivity of 80% (confidence interval 0.72-0.87) and a collective specificity of 97% (confidence interval 0.95-0.98). Snapping multiple photographs and removal of cerumen where necessary in increasing the quality of the photographs for diagnosis. Conclusions: The TEO holds the promise of substantially enhancing the accessibility of audiology services, encompassing evaluation, public outreach, and fundamental care. Its implementation has the potential to fortify primary health care environments, contributing to the prevention of ear diseases and assisting in mitigating the shortage of skilled ear care professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.