ArticleHeliyon2024
Characterizing orthodontic mini-screws in the hard palate of pigs: An experimental and finite-element study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Insertion Torque of Orthodontic Mini-Implants Depending on the System and the Morphological Substrate.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Study on the Reasonability of Single-Objective Optimization in Miniscrew Design.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- What is the impact of patient attributes, implant characteristics, surgical techniques, and placement location on the success of orthodontic mini-implants in young adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Review
- Finite element study on post-screw removal stress in toy poodle radius with different plate designs and screw arrangements.Open veterinary journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This paper analyses the mechanical response of mini-implants under pull-out, push-in, and shear forces. Materials and methods: The authors have devised a specialized testing apparatus, using a universal testing machine, for the mechanical characterisation of orthodontic mini-implants (OMI) installed in pig hard palate. The experimental investigation encompasses seven screw types, each subjected to pull-out, push-in, and shear forces. Each test was conducted three times to assess the inherent uncertainties, with three torque insertions, with a total of 189 tests. The resulting load-displacement curves provide information on the secant stiffness and ultimate capacity of the tested screws in all three loading scenarios.These findings were used to develop a 3D finite element model to assess the OMI mechanical performance. Results: Torque is particularly influential in push-in tests for both dependent variables. At the same time, the length appears to be more critical in pull-out tests for the capacity. Diameter's influence is consistent across all tests but is especially significant for the secant stiffness in shear tests. Conclusions: Pull-out tests displayed linear behaviour until failure, whereas push-in tests showed increasing stiffness with more significant deformation. Higher torque led to higher capacity with a minor effect on the stiffness. Clinical significance: This paper provides insights into the mechanical behaviour of orthodontic mini-implants, offering guidance to orthodontic practitioners and researchers. Understanding how torque affects stability and performance under different loads informs the selection and design of mini-implants, potentially improving orthodontic treatments and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.