Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668854›Full record

ReviewMedical acupuncture2024

Electroacupuncture for Pain Therapy: A Bibliometric Analysis and Content Review Update for 1 Decade (2013-2022).

Balgis, Selfi Handayani, Nanang Wiyono

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical acupuncture, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Medical acupuncture · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

BalgisDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.
Selfi HandayaniDepartment of Acupuncture, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.
Nanang WiyonoDepartment of Acupuncture, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Each year, pain imposes significant economic and social burdens, such as increased physician visits, analgesic use, and decreased productivity. Electroacupuncture (EA) was first used in China and is a potential addition to existing pain-relief approaches. Globally and exponentially, the number of fundamental and clinical studies on EA has increased over the past decade. Most bibliometric studies in this area focus on acupuncture therapy. A prevalent quantitative and qualitative approach, bibliometric analysis scrutinizes published scholarly articles and can be used to assess advancements in specific research domains. Yet, to the best of the current authors' knowledge, no specific bibliometric analysis of EA as a pain therapy has yet been conducted. Methods: Article data were taken from the Scopus Results: This study showed the rapid growth in the study of EA in the last decade. Additionally, Conclusions: Despite China's substantial publication output on EA, international collaboration is limited, particularly among nations other than the United States and China.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysiselectroacupuncturepain therapy

Identifiers

PMID39668854
PMCPMC11632150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.