Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668811›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025

Understanding Early Treatment Response in Brief CBT for Nonunderweight Eating Disorders: A Mixed Methods Study.

Dana Gatley, Verity Millar-Sarahs, Amy Brown, Cat Papastavrou Brooks, Faith Matcham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dana GatleySchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-0202-6932
Verity Millar-SarahsSussex Partnership Innovation and Research in Eating Disorders (SPIRED) Clinic, Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust, Sussex, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-9626-2912
Amy BrownSussex Partnership Innovation and Research in Eating Disorders (SPIRED) Clinic, Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust, Sussex, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6994-1472
Cat Papastavrou BrooksSussex Partnership Innovation and Research in Eating Disorders (SPIRED) Clinic, Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust, Sussex, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3055-5301
Faith MatchamSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4055-904X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly change in eating disorder psychopathology is the most robust predictor of treatment outcomes in eating disorders. However, little is known about what predicts early change. Using mixed-methodology, this study explored predictors of early change in the first four sessions of 10-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-T) for nonunderweight eating disorders.

methodPhase 1: interviews were conducted to explore CBT-T clinicians' perspectives on predictors of early change. Phase 2: robust multiple regressions were undertaken to examine whether any of five variables identified during interviews-diagnosis, wait time, therapeutic alliance, depression, and anxiety-were associated with early change in eating disorder psychopathology. Data were derived from outcome measures for service users (n = 107) receiving CBT-T in a community eating disorder service.

resultsPhase 1: eight themes were identified: attitudes to making change, diagnosis, external mitigating circumstances, therapeutic alliance, therapist confidence, pretreatment variables, CBT-T format, and therapeutic suitability. Phase 2: no significant associations were found between the five predictor variables (diagnosis type, wait time, baseline depression, baseline anxiety, and therapeutic alliance) and early change in EDE-Q scores. These results have been certified as computationally reproducible by an independent statistician. DISCUSSION: Qualitative findings identified several potential predictors of early change in eating disorder psychopathology in CBT-T, however, quantitative data contradicted qualitative findings, finding no significant association for any of the tested variables. Further research is required to clarify theses conflicting findings and to quantitatively explore the additional predictors highlighted during qualitative analysis.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyFeeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult10‐session cognitive behavioral therapyatypical anorexia nervosabinge‐eating disorderbulimia nervosaCBT‐Tearly changenonunderweight eating disordersOSFEDpredictors

Identifiers

PMID39668811
PMCPMC11891623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.