ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Prediction of T Stage of Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy by Multi-Parameter Magnetic Resonance Radiomics Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics' Role in Predicting Distant Metastases, Recurrence and Survival Outcome in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Predictive imaging in abdominal oncology: current trends and future directions.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Mortality Prediction from Patient's First Day PAAC Radiograph in Internal Medicine Intensive Care Unit Using Artificial Intelligence Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Immunotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Enhanced CT Radiomics Combined with Clinical Features.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSince the response of patients with rectal cancer (RC) to neoadjuvant therapy is highly variable, there is an urgent need to develop accurate methods to predict the post-treatment T (pT) stage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of multi-parametric MRI radiomics models and identify the most accurate machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting pT stage of RC.
methodThis retrospective study analyzed pretreatment clinical features of 171 RC patients who underwent 3 T MRI prior to neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent total mesorectal excision. Tumors were manually drawn as regions of interest (ROI) layer by layer on high-resolution T2-weighted image (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (CE-T1WI) using ITK-SNAP software. The most relevant features of pT stage from CE-T1WI, T2WI, and fusion features (combination of clinical features, CE-T1WI, and T2WI radiomics features) were extracted by the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator method. Clinical, CE-T1WI radiomics, T2WI radiomics, and fusion models were established by ML multiple classifiers.
resultsIn the clinical model, the LightGBM algorithm demonstrated the highest efficiency, with AUC values of 0.857 and 0.702 for the training and test cohorts, respectively. For the T2WI and CE-T1WI models, the SVM algorithm was the most efficient; AUC = 0.969 and 0.868 in the training cohort, and 0.839 and 0.760 in the test cohort, respectively. The fusion model yielded the highest predictive performance using the LR algorithm; AUC = 0.967 and 0.932 in the training and test cohorts, respectively.
conclusionRadiomics features extracted from CE-T1WI and T2WI images and clinical features were effective predictors of pT stage in patients with rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy. ML-based multi-parameter MRI radiomics model incorporating relevant clinical features can improve the pT stage prediction accuracy of RC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.