Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668622›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2025

Sustainability of California's Whole Person Care pilots integrating medical and social services for Medicaid enrollees via newly developed Medicaid benefits.

Nadia Safaeinili, Emmeline Chuang, Mark Fleming, Shoba Ramanadhan, Nadereh Pourat, Amanda Brewster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadia SafaeiniliSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4792-3091
Emmeline ChuangSchool of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-3273
Mark FlemingSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3037-704X
Shoba RamanadhanUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nadereh PouratCenter for Health Policy Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5118-1188
Amanda BrewsterSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4024-5830

Funding

AHRQ HHS K01 HS027648Department of Health Care ServicesRobert Wood Johnson Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess multi-level factors influencing the sustainability of 26 social care pilots integrating medical and social services for Medicaid enrollees across California in newly developed Medicaid benefits. STUDY SETTING AND

designThis qualitative study assessed the sustainability of Whole Person Care (WPC) pilots implemented between 2016 and 2021. Pilots (n = 26) represented a majority of counties in California. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Primary qualitative data were collected between June and August 2021 and included 58 hour-long, semi-structured individual and group interviews with administrators, middle managers, and frontline case management staff representing all WPC pilots. We used hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis to identify and analyze patterns, and outliers, in factors influencing sustainment. Deductive codes included established implementation science factors influencing the sustainability of new programs (e.g., innovation characteristics, capacity, processes and interactions, and context). PRINCIPAL

findingsOf 26 WPC pilots, 22 pilots sustained WPC by contracting with Medicaid managed care plans to provide services as part of newly developed Medicaid benefits. Three pilots chose not to sustain before the pilot period ended and one pilot decided not to sustain following completion of the full pilot. Factors influencing sustainability included: (1) program adaptability and flexibility; (2) funding structure and reimbursement requirements; (3) shared leadership with managed care plans; and (4) whether pilots chose to build out program infrastructure internally or contracted out core components to partner organizations. Many pilots, particularly those in rural areas, indicated that system and policy changes introduced as part of transitioning pilot services into Medicaid benefits reduced the sustainability of WPC for participating providers.

conclusionsMulti-level factors including program adaptability, funding, leadership, and capacity to build out infrastructure influenced the sustainability of WPC pilots. These findings have significant implications for health equity as equitable distribution of services, resources, and benefits from these programs can be supported through sustained implementation over time.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedMedicaidSocial WorkCaliforniaHumansManaged Care ProgramsPilot ProjectsPilotsProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchUnited Statesimplementation scienceMedicaidmedical and social service integrationqualitativesustainabilityWhole Person Care

Identifiers

PMID39668622
PMCPMC12052503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.