ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2024
Esophageal perforation management: a single-center experience.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of surgical outcomes in esophageal injuries: a 20-year retrospective analysis.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Recurrent idiopathic esophageal perforation complicated by thyroid abscess: a case report and review of the literature.AME case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal perforation is a serious medical condition where a hole or tear develops in the esophagus, the muscular tube that connects the throat to the stomach. Although rare, the condition is potentially life-threatening, as it can lead to infection and inflammation in surrounding tissues, including the mediastinum, pleura, and peritoneum.
methodsBetween 2014 and 2022, a retrospective study was conducted on cases of esophageal rupture treated at our institution. Eighteen cases were included in the study. Patient data, including age, gender, risk factors, delay in diagnosis, diagnostic method, site of perforation, etiology of perforation, treatment approach, complications, length of hospital stay, and outcomes, were collected. The Pittsburgh Severity Score (PSS) was calculated for each patient.
resultsThe mean patient age was 46.33 years, with a male predominance (72.2%). Causes included iatrogenic (22.2%), foreign body (50%), and trauma (27.8%). Perforations primarily occurred in the cervical (38.9%), thoracic (33.3%), and distal esophagus (27.8%). Higher mortality was associated with elevated white blood cell count (WBC), delayed diagnosis, and contrast leakage (p<0.05). Computed tomography (CT) findings and complications significantly influenced intensive care unit (ICU) stay, with abscesses reducing and mediastinitis increasing the duration (p<0.05). Other factors, including age, length of hospitalization, gender, etiology, and treatment type, did not significantly affect Pittsburg Severity Scores (p>0.05).
conclusionEsophageal perforation remains a challenging clinical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To optimize patient outcomes, rapid diagnosis, risk stratification using tools such as the PSS, and tailored management strategies are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.