Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668535›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2024

Esophageal perforation management: a single-center experience.

Sedat Çarkıt, Funda İpekten, Mustafa Karaağaç, Mustafa Gök, Muhammet Akyuz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of surgical outcomes in esophageal injuries: a 20-year retrospective analysis.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sedat ÇarkıtDepartment of General Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri-Türkiye.
Funda İpektenDepartment of Biostatistics, Adıyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman-Türkiye.
Mustafa KaraağaçDepartment of General Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri-Türkiye.
Mustafa GökDepartment of General Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri-Türkiye.
Muhammet AkyuzDepartment of General Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri-Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal perforation is a serious medical condition where a hole or tear develops in the esophagus, the muscular tube that connects the throat to the stomach. Although rare, the condition is potentially life-threatening, as it can lead to infection and inflammation in surrounding tissues, including the mediastinum, pleura, and peritoneum.

methodsBetween 2014 and 2022, a retrospective study was conducted on cases of esophageal rupture treated at our institution. Eighteen cases were included in the study. Patient data, including age, gender, risk factors, delay in diagnosis, diagnostic method, site of perforation, etiology of perforation, treatment approach, complications, length of hospital stay, and outcomes, were collected. The Pittsburgh Severity Score (PSS) was calculated for each patient.

resultsThe mean patient age was 46.33 years, with a male predominance (72.2%). Causes included iatrogenic (22.2%), foreign body (50%), and trauma (27.8%). Perforations primarily occurred in the cervical (38.9%), thoracic (33.3%), and distal esophagus (27.8%). Higher mortality was associated with elevated white blood cell count (WBC), delayed diagnosis, and contrast leakage (p<0.05). Computed tomography (CT) findings and complications significantly influenced intensive care unit (ICU) stay, with abscesses reducing and mediastinitis increasing the duration (p<0.05). Other factors, including age, length of hospitalization, gender, etiology, and treatment type, did not significantly affect Pittsburg Severity Scores (p>0.05).

conclusionEsophageal perforation remains a challenging clinical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To optimize patient outcomes, rapid diagnosis, risk stratification using tools such as the PSS, and tailored management strategies are essential.

Indexed as

Esophageal PerforationAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39668535
PMCPMC11849878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.