Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668375›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Provision of hospice and palliative care and implementation of advance care planning for residents in German nursing homes - a cross-sectional study.

Christopher Berloge, Anna Völkel, Hannes Jacobs, Birte Burger, Jona T Stahmeyer, Anna Levke Brütt, Falk Hoffmann, Tanja Schleef, Stephanie Stiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher BerlogeInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
Anna VölkelDepartment of Health Services Research, Junior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Hannes JacobsDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Birte BurgerHealth Services Research Unit, AOK Niedersachsen, Hannover, Germany.
Jona T StahmeyerHealth Services Research Unit, AOK Niedersachsen, Hannover, Germany.
Anna Levke BrüttDepartment of Health Services Research, Junior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Falk HoffmannDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Tanja Schleef *Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany. Schleef.tanja@mh-hannover.de.
Stephanie Stiel *Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemographic changes are leading to a rise in the demand for care services, with nursing homes (NHs) playing an increasingly important role in end-of-life care. Evidence suggests that NH residents at the end of life significantly benefit from hospice and palliative care and the implementation of advance care planning (ACP). In 2018, Germany passed a law to promote the implementation of ACP in NHs and to enable the refinancing of ACP services by the statutory health insurance funds. The present study aimed at assessing current hospice and palliative care structures, examining the implementation of ACP and identifying barriers to obtain approval for billing for ACP services under this specific legislative (§ 132 g SGB V).

methodsAs a part of the "Gut-Leben" project, the present study administered a cross-sectional quantitative survey in 2023 to evaluate hospice and palliative care structures, the implementation of ACP, and barriers to ACP approval in German NHs. A questionnaire was distributed to a random sample of N = 1,369 NH managers. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods.

resultsN = 330 NH managers responded to the questionnaire (24.1% response). The majority described the end-of-life care structures in their region as rather good (77.7; n = 256), and very strong collaboration was reported with general practitioners (54.7%), physiotherapists (42.9%), and palliative care physicians (38.6%). Awareness of the legislative for ACP was reported by n = 201 NHs (64.4%), and 100 (50.3%) of these NHs had already obtained approval. The primary barriers to approval identified by 68 NHs included a lack of available staff (48.5%; n = 33) and a small facility size (27.9%; n = 19).

conclusionsAlthough half of the NHs have implemented ACP, there is still a need to enhance awareness of the ACP legislative. These efforts should aim to reduce the existing barriers to approval, which could be achieved, for instance, by fostering collaboration between NHs or by cooperating with external ACP service providers.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningHospice CareNursing HomesPalliative CareAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvance care planningEnd-of-lifeNursing homePalliative care

Identifiers

PMID39668375
PMCPMC11636033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.