Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668341›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2024

REmoval of cytokines during CArdiac surgery (RECCAS): a randomised controlled trial.

Andreas Hohn, Nathalie M Malewicz-Oeck, Dirk Buchwald, Thorsten Annecke, Peter K Zahn, Andreas Baumann

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotics and Other Drugs Removal by the CytoSorbAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Severe Vasoplegic Syndrome Treated with Angiotensin II and Hemoadsorption Therapy after Cardiac Surgery.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andreas Hohn *Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Nathalie M Malewicz-Oeck *Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical Faculty of Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Dirk BuchwaldDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Thorsten AnneckeFaculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Peter K ZahnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical Faculty of Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Andreas BaumannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical Faculty of Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany. andreas.baumann@bergmannsheil.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) triggers marked cytokine release often followed by a systemic inflammatory response syndrome, associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. This trial investigates the intraoperative use of haemoadsorption (HA) during cardiac surgery with CPB to assess its impact on postoperative systemic inflammatory response.

methodsIn this prospective randomised controlled trial (ethics approval no. 5094-14DRKS00007928), patients (> 65 years) undergoing elective on-pump cardiac surgery were randomised to intraoperative HA (CytoSorb) during CPB or standard care without HA. Primary outcome was the difference in mean interleukin (IL)-6 serum concentrations between groups on intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The secondary outcomes included various clinical and biochemical endpoints. Statistical methods included paired and unpaired t-tests, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U-tests, and chi-square tests.

resultsThirty-eight patients were allocated to receive either intraoperative HA (n = 19) or standard care (n = 19). The primary outcome, IL-6 levels on ICU admission, did not differ between the study group and controls (214.4 ± 328.8 vs. 155.8 ± 159.6 pg/ml, p = 0.511). During surgery pre- versus post-adsorber IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, heparan sulfate and myoglobin post- levels were reduced. Furthermore, IL-6 levels did not differ between the study groups on day 1 and 2 in the ICU. While sequential organ failure assessment scores, lactate levels, and C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (PCT) showed no statistically significant differences. Regarding haemodynamic stability in the treatment group the cardiac index (3.2 ± 0.7 vs. 2.47 ± 0.47 l/min/m

conclusionHA did not reduce the IL-6 level on ICU admission or afterwards. Even though HA reduced cytokine load during cardiac surgery in the treatment group. There were no significant differences between groups in the postoperative course of other cytokine concentrations, organ dysfunction, ICU and hospital lengths of stay and mortality rates. Trial registration prospectively DRKS00007928 and published under: Baumann A, Buchwald D, Annecke T, Hellmich M, Zahn PK, Hohn A. RECCAS - REmoval of Cytokines during Cardiac Surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. TRIALS: 2016;17: 137.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresCytokinesAgedCardiopulmonary BypassFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterleukin-6MaleProspective StudiesCytokinesInterleukin-6Cardiac SurgeryCardiopulmonary bypassCytokinesHaemoadsorptionHeart–lung-machineInflammation

Identifiers

PMID39668341
PMCPMC11639119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.