Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668267›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2024

Early orthodontic treatment need over a 10-year period and evaluation of short-term intervention stability.

Maike Tabellion, Ines Caroline Loef, Constanze Charlotte Linsenmann, Jörg Alexander Lisson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bibliometric analysis of research trends in early orthodontic treatment: a two-decade perspective (2000-2025).Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maike TabellionDepartment of Orthodontics (G56), Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany. maike.tabellion@uks.eu.
Ines Caroline LoefDepartment of Orthodontics (G56), Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Constanze Charlotte LinsenmannDepartment of Orthodontics (G56), Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Jörg Alexander LissonDepartment of Orthodontics (G56), Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly orthodontic treatment with cost reimbursement within the framework of the German statutory health insurance (GKV) is only possible for a strictly defined malocclusion group as defined by the orthodontic indication groups (KIG). It is not yet clear whether the application of the KIG criteria and corresponding successful early orthodontic interventions result in no or significantly less need for treatment in the late mixed dentition or in the permanent dentition. This study therefore investigated short-term intervention stability from a 10-year-period. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween 2009 and 2019, n = 661 patients were diagnosed with indication groups D (increased overjet), M (reversed overjet), B (scissors bite), K (crossbite), or P (lack of space) including orthodontic treatment need. N = 70 patients (35 female, 35 male) met the inclusion criteria of the study and had received early orthodontic treatment with a mean duration of 15.44 ± 2.20 months. Orthodontic indication groups (KIG) were evaluated at the beginning (aged 7.99 ± 1.44 years) and the end of early orthodontic treatment (aged 9.63 ± 1.49 years) and at a voluntary control or the beginning of additional orthodontic treatment (aged 11.85 ± 1.72 years). The evaluation included established procedures for categorization of orthodontic indication groups and their respective classification. Statistics included Chi-square test and Kendall´s tau-b. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

resultsThe results showed reversed overjet in 44.3% and crossbites in 41.4% of the patients as most common indication for early orthodontic treatment. At the end of early orthodontic treatment, no orthodontic treatment need was present in 87.1%. At the late mixed dentition, the treatment result of early orthodontic treatment was stable in N = 61 out of N = 70 patients.

conclusionsThe results of our study confirm preventive benefits of early orthodontic treatment, especially in patients with transverse anomalies or reversed overjet. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A short-term orthodontic intervention with correct indication during primary or early mixed dentition can prevent or reduce further treatment need during late mixed or permanent dentition, and should therefore not be postponed.

Indexed as

MalocclusionOrthodontics, CorrectiveChildDentition, MixedDentition, PermanentFemaleGermanyHumansIndex of Orthodontic Treatment NeedMaleEarly orthodontic treatmentOrthodontic indication groupsOrthodontic treatment needTreatment stability

Identifiers

PMID39668267
PMCPMC11638389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.