Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39667952›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2024

Towards a definition of refractory/therapy-resistant/intractable constipation in children: a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based, online survey.

Morris Gordon, Wathsala Hathagoda, Shaman Rajindrajith, Vassiliki Sinopoulou, Mansour Abdulshafea, Carlos Velasco, Merit Tabbers, Marc A Benninga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Morris GordonUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK Mgordon@uclan.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1216-5158
Wathsala HathagodaPediatrics, University of Colombo Faculty of Medicine, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Shaman RajindrajithUniversity of Colombo Faculty of Medicine, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Vassiliki SinopoulouUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2831-9406
Mansour AbdulshafeaUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Carlos VelascoPediatrics, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Merit TabbersEmma Childrens' Hospital UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc A BenningaPediatrics, Emma Childrens' Hospital UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Rome criteria define childhood functional constipation but do not address refractory constipation. Attempts to define refractory constipation lack consensus. The interchangeable use of 'refractory' and 'intractable' or 'therapy-resistant' constipation and lack of understanding of the therapeutic ceilings before this diagnosis complicates the definition.

aimTo conduct an online cross-sectional study among medical professionals and researchers across a range of countries, to propose a consensus definition, terminology and duration of medically unresponsive constipation.

methodAn expert-designed questionnaire was disseminated via Google Forms in a two-stage study over 2 months targeting paediatric gastroenterology professionals globally and Latin American clinicians with a translated version. The questionnaire had seven critical questions containing details needed to define medically unresponsive constipation. The study protocol was approved by the ethics review panel.

resultsThe survey involved 1079 participants: 87 from various countries in the first phase and 992 from Latin America in the second. There were 619 (57.3%) general paediatricians and 462 (43 %) paediatric gastroenterologists. The preferred term to indicate poorly responding constipation was 'therapy-resistant constipation' (47.8%), followed by 'refractory constipation' (43.6%). The majority of respondents (92.9%) agreed on considering a time frame for defining refractory constipation, with 37.7% suggesting 2-3 months. 467 (43.2%) recommended including failure despite maximum laxative therapy with two agents should be considered as previous therapy failure. Compliance with therapy was deemed essential for successful treatment by 91.1%, assessed through detailed history-taking (47.4%) or medical/pharmacy records (29.4%).

conclusionBased on the professional views collected in this study, we propose the term 'therapy-resistant constipation' and it can be defined as constipation that is not responding to a maximum dose of at least two laxatives of different classes for a minimum of 3 months with good compliance in a secondary or tertiary care facility.

Indexed as

ConstipationChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminology as TopicData CollectionGastroenterologyQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39667952
PMCPMC11647291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.