SynthesisBMJ open gastroenterology2024
Effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies.
Synthesis in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized controlled phase Ia clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of tofacitinib tartrate cream (HZ-J001) in healthy Chinese subjects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Optimizing Janus kinase inhibitor therapy for ulcerative colitis: a real-world perspective.Intestinal research · 2026Review
- Lessons from extended induction and practical evidence for improving tofacitinib therapy in ulcerative colitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis in Brazil: a multicenter observational study on effectiveness and safety.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Serum Lipids Alterations in Patients Under Systemic JAK Inhibitors Treatments in Dermatology: Clinical Aspects and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of tofacitinib for treating moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).
designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception up to 18 July 2023. Reference lists of included studies were manually searched to identify potentially relevant studies not found in the databases. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible studies included real-world observational studies, reported in English, on patients with moderate-to-severe UC treated with tofacitinib, defined by the Partial Mayo Score. Excluded were clinical trials, reviews, letters, conference abstracts, case reports and studies involving patients with mixed Crohn's disease. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and recorded it in Excel. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models due to high heterogeneity across studies.
results19 studies containing a total of 2612 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that clinical response rates were 58% at week 8, 61% at weeks 12-16, 51% at weeks 24-26 and 51% at week 52. Clinical remission rates were 39% at week 8, 43% at weeks 12-16, 40% at weeks 24-26 and 43% at week 52. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were 33% at week 8, 37% at weeks 12-16, 32% at weeks 24-26 and 40% at week 52.
conclusionThis meta-analysis of real-world studies indicates that treatment of UC with tofacitinib is associated with favourable clinical response and remission rates in the induction and maintenance phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.