Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39667742›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025

Management of Bone Defects and Complications After Bone Tumor Resection Using Ilizarov Method.

Kai Zheng, Xiu-Chun Yu, Jinfang Cai, Ming Xu, Haocheng Cui, Qian Chen, Jing-Yu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Clinical advances in Ilizarov technique for foot and ankle trauma].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kai ZhengDepartment of Orthopedics, The 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistice Support Force, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9122-877X
Xiu-Chun YuDepartment of Orthopedics, The 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistice Support Force, Jinan, China.
Jinfang CaiDepartment of Orthopedics, The 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistice Support Force, Jinan, China.
Ming XuDepartment of Orthopedics, The 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistice Support Force, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2086-8651
Haocheng CuiDepartment of Orthopedics, The 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistice Support Force, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6592-6580
Qian ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, The 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistice Support Force, Jinan, China.
Jing-Yu ZhangDepartment of Bone Tumor, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4924-6418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIlizarov technology is highly effective in addressing complex orthopedic challenges. This study aims to describe our experience with distraction osteogenesis in managing bone tumors in the lower extremity, focusing on composite bone defects and associated complications.

methodsA retrospective clinical study was conducted to analyze patients with primary bone tumors who underwent distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov method from 2010 to 2020. Some young children received epiphyseal distraction and bone transport as part of their sarcoma surgical treatment. Additionally, external fixation, bone transport, or limb lengthening were employed to address complex postoperative complications associated with bone tumors. The clinical outcomes assessed included the patient's general information, the location of bone defects, the length of bone repair, the status of bone healing, and limb function.

resultsEleven patients were followed up for an average of 66 months (range, 24-132 months). The average length of repaired bone defects was 13 cm (range, 2.5-32 cm). The cohort comprised three females and eight males, with ages at presentation ranging from 6 to 42 years (mean, 18 years). The sites of involvement included the distal femur (n = 4), femoral diaphysis (n = 3), proximal tibia (n = 2), and the distal tibia (n = 2). Nine patients were diagnosed with osteosarcoma, while one presented with Ewing's sarcoma and another with a giant cell tumor of bone. Three young children were successfully treated with epiphyseal stretching; however, one patient experienced treatment failure. Additionally, seven patients underwent external fixation to address complex postoperative complications, including infection, bone defects, and limb shortening. At the last follow-up, with the exception of one failure, the average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) limb function scores for the remaining 10 patients were 25 (range, 21-30). Three months post-fixator removal, the Asociación Latinoamericana de Oncología (ASAMI) bone score was rated as excellent in 63.6% (7/11) of patients, whereas the ASAMI function score was excellent in 36.4% (4/11) and good in 54.5% (6/11) of cases.

conclusionThe Ilizarov method demonstrates some clinical value in the resection and reconstruction of bone tumors, as well as in the management of postoperative complications associated with such tumors.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsIlizarov TechniquePostoperative ComplicationsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleOsteosarcomaRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultbone defectbone tumorIlizarov methodlimb salvagereconstruction

Identifiers

PMID39667742
PMCPMC11787982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.