ReviewCell genomics2024
scTrends: A living review of commercial single-cell and spatial 'omic technologies.
Review in Cell genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in biomarker discovery for diseases: diagnostic and therapeutic prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Decoding Cardiac Development and Maturation at Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomic Resolution.Circulation research · 2026Review
- Leveraging single-cell and spatial omics for brain tumour insights to improve therapeutic strategies.Molecular brain · 2026Review
- Single-cell spatial transcriptomics reveals tumor microenvironment heterogeneity in primary and lymph node-metastatic small cell lung cancer.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular systems, human noncoding sequence variants, and blood pressure.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- A practical guide to targeted single-cell RNA sequencing technologies.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Spatial architecture of development and disease.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- An expanded role for single-cell chemical genomics profiling in drug discovery.The Biochemical journal · 2026Review
- The evolving role of the immune microenvironment of tumor draining lymph nodes in the development of biomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- CapMux: a Snakemake pipeline for early demultiplexing of split-pool scRNA-seq data into sample-resolved outputs.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Characterization of the bone marrow architecture of multiple myeloma using spatial transcriptomics.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Modular, open-sourced multiplexing for democratizing spatial omics.Lab on a chip · 2025Article
- Current Role and Future Frontiers of Spatial Transcriptomics in Genitourinary Cancers.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the rapidly evolving landscape of single-cell and spatial omic technologies is crucial for advancing biomedical research and drug development. We provide a living review of both mature and emerging commercial platforms, highlighting key methodologies and trends shaping the field. This review spans from foundational single-cell technologies such as microfluidics and plate-based methods to newer approaches like combinatorial indexing; on the spatial side, we consider next-generation sequencing and imaging-based spatial transcriptomics. Finally, we highlight emerging methodologies that may fundamentally expand the scope for data generation within pharmaceutical research, creating opportunities to discover and validate novel drug mechanisms. Overall, this review serves as a critical resource for navigating the commercialization and application of single-cell and spatial omic technologies in pharmaceutical and academic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.