Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39667253›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2025

Outlier detection in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging: Shot rejection or robust fitting?

Sam Coveney, Maryam Afzali, Lars Mueller, Irvin Teh, Arka Das, Erica Dall'Armellina, Filip Szczepankiewicz, Derek K Jones, Jurgen E Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sam CoveneyBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. Electronic address: coveney.sam@gmail.com.
Maryam AfzaliBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Lars MuellerBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Irvin TehBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Arka DasBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Erica Dall'ArmellinaBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Filip SzczepankiewiczMedical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Derek K JonesCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Jurgen E SchneiderBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.e.schneider@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is highly prone to image corruption, yet robust-fitting methods are rarely used. Single voxel outlier detection (SVOD) can overlook corruptions that are visually obvious, perhaps causing reluctance to replace whole-image shot-rejection (SR) despite its own deficiencies. SVOD's deficiencies may be relatively unimportant: corrupted signals that are not statistical outliers may not be detrimental. Multiple voxel outlier detection (MVOD), using a local myocardial neighbourhood, may overcome the shared deficiencies of SR and SVOD for cDTI while keeping the benefits of both. Here, robust fitting methods using M-estimators are derived for both non-linear least squares and weighted least squares fitting, and outlier detection is applied using (i) SVOD; and (ii) SVOD and MVOD. These methods, along with non-robust fitting with/without SR, are applied to cDTI datasets from healthy volunteers and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Robust fitting methods produce larger group differences with more statistical significance for MD, FA, and E2A, versus non-robust methods, with MVOD giving the largest group differences for MD and FA. Visual analysis demonstrates the superiority of robust-fitting methods over SR, especially when it is difficult to partition the images into good and bad sets. Synthetic experiments confirm that MVOD gives lower root-mean-square-error than SVOD.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsDiffusion Tensor ImagingImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedPattern Recognition, AutomatedHumansImage EnhancementReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityCardiacDiffusion tensor imagingMagnetic resonance imagingM-estimatorOutlier detectionRobust estimation

Identifiers

PMID39667253
PMCPMC7619604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.