ArticleMedical image analysis2025
Outlier detection in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging: Shot rejection or robust fitting?
Article in Medical image analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty Quantification for Cardiac Diffusion Tensor Imaging Without Additional Datasets.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- The Effect of Voxel Volume and Voxel Shape on Cardiac Diffusion Tensor Imaging Metrics.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Robust constrained weighted least squares for in vivo human cardiac diffusion kurtosis imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Cardiac diffusion kurtosis imaging in the human heart in vivo using 300 mT/m gradients.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is highly prone to image corruption, yet robust-fitting methods are rarely used. Single voxel outlier detection (SVOD) can overlook corruptions that are visually obvious, perhaps causing reluctance to replace whole-image shot-rejection (SR) despite its own deficiencies. SVOD's deficiencies may be relatively unimportant: corrupted signals that are not statistical outliers may not be detrimental. Multiple voxel outlier detection (MVOD), using a local myocardial neighbourhood, may overcome the shared deficiencies of SR and SVOD for cDTI while keeping the benefits of both. Here, robust fitting methods using M-estimators are derived for both non-linear least squares and weighted least squares fitting, and outlier detection is applied using (i) SVOD; and (ii) SVOD and MVOD. These methods, along with non-robust fitting with/without SR, are applied to cDTI datasets from healthy volunteers and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Robust fitting methods produce larger group differences with more statistical significance for MD, FA, and E2A, versus non-robust methods, with MVOD giving the largest group differences for MD and FA. Visual analysis demonstrates the superiority of robust-fitting methods over SR, especially when it is difficult to partition the images into good and bad sets. Synthetic experiments confirm that MVOD gives lower root-mean-square-error than SVOD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.