Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666942›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

A near-tight lower bound on the density of forward sampling schemes.

Bryce Kille, Ragnar Groot Koerkamp, Drake McAdams, Alan Liu, Todd J Treangen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Min-frame transformation enables more sensitive viral genome alignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. GreedyMini: generating low-density DNA minimizers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. Fast and flexible minimizer digestion with digest.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  5. The open-closed mod-minimizer algorithm.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bryce KilleDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2946-6915
Ragnar Groot KoerkampDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2091-1237
Drake McAdamsDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States.
Alan LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States.
Todd J TreangenDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINET15LM007093 · NLM · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI Lydia E. Kavraki · 1992 to 2026
$20.8M
Project 3: Functional Microbiome and Host Signatures in Transition from Commensal to pathogenP01AI152999 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ARIAS, CESAR AUGUSTO, SAVIDGE, TOR C. · 2020 to 2025
$12.0M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases P01-AI152999National Library of Medicine Training Program in Biomed-ical Informatics and Data Science T15LM007093National Science Foundation IIS-2239114NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI152999NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSampling k-mers is a ubiquitous task in sequence analysis algorithms. Sampling schemes such as the often-used random minimizer scheme are particularly appealing as they guarantee at least one k-mer is selected out of every w consecutive k-mers. Sampling fewer k-mers often leads to an increase in efficiency of downstream methods. Thus, developing schemes that have low density, i.e. have a small proportion of sampled k-mers, is an active area of research. After over a decade of consistent efforts in both decreasing the density of practical schemes and increasing the lower bound on the best possible density, there is still a large gap between the two.

resultsWe prove a near-tight lower bound on the density of forward sampling schemes, a class of schemes that generalizes minimizer schemes. For small w and k, we observe that our bound is tight when k≡1(mod w). For large w and k, the bound can be approximated by 1w+k⌈w+kw⌉. Importantly, our lower bound implies that existing schemes are much closer to achieving optimal density than previously known. For example, with the current default minimap2 HiFi settings w = 19 and k = 19, we show that the best known scheme for these parameters, the double decycling-set-based minimizer of Pellow et al. is at most 3% denser than optimal, compared to the previous gap of at most 50%. Furthermore, when k≡1(mod w) and the alphabet size σ goes to ∞, we show that mod-minimizers introduced by Groot Koerkamp and Pibiri achieve optimal density matching our lower bound. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Minimizer implementations: github.com/RagnarGrootKoerkamp/minimizers ILP and analysis: github.com/treangenlab/sampling-scheme-analysis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational Biology

Identifiers

PMID39666942
PMCPMC11676336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.