ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
A near-tight lower bound on the density of forward sampling schemes.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation, Functional Screening, and Genomic Characterization of a Potential Probiotic Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum MP49 from Traditionally Fermented Bamboo Shoots of Tripura, India.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Min-frame transformation enables more sensitive viral genome alignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- GreedyMini: generating low-density DNA minimizers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Fast and flexible minimizer digestion with digest.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- The open-closed mod-minimizer algorithm.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSampling k-mers is a ubiquitous task in sequence analysis algorithms. Sampling schemes such as the often-used random minimizer scheme are particularly appealing as they guarantee at least one k-mer is selected out of every w consecutive k-mers. Sampling fewer k-mers often leads to an increase in efficiency of downstream methods. Thus, developing schemes that have low density, i.e. have a small proportion of sampled k-mers, is an active area of research. After over a decade of consistent efforts in both decreasing the density of practical schemes and increasing the lower bound on the best possible density, there is still a large gap between the two.
resultsWe prove a near-tight lower bound on the density of forward sampling schemes, a class of schemes that generalizes minimizer schemes. For small w and k, we observe that our bound is tight when k≡1(mod w). For large w and k, the bound can be approximated by 1w+k⌈w+kw⌉. Importantly, our lower bound implies that existing schemes are much closer to achieving optimal density than previously known. For example, with the current default minimap2 HiFi settings w = 19 and k = 19, we show that the best known scheme for these parameters, the double decycling-set-based minimizer of Pellow et al. is at most 3% denser than optimal, compared to the previous gap of at most 50%. Furthermore, when k≡1(mod w) and the alphabet size σ goes to ∞, we show that mod-minimizers introduced by Groot Koerkamp and Pibiri achieve optimal density matching our lower bound. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Minimizer implementations: github.com/RagnarGrootKoerkamp/minimizers ILP and analysis: github.com/treangenlab/sampling-scheme-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.