Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666915›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2024

Development and Clinical Validation of Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Application-Artificial Intelligence Tool Using Cervical Images in Screen-and-Treat Visual Screening for Cervical Cancer in South India: A Pilot Study.

Usha Rani Poli, Anirudh G Gudlavalleti, Jaya Bharadwaj Y, Hira B Pant, Varun Agiwal, G V S Murthy

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Usha Rani PoliPublic Health Foundation of India, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6336-2274
Anirudh G GudlavalletiPublic Health Foundation of India, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7339-5320
Jaya Bharadwaj YJoly AI, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0009-0001-0108-1645
Hira B PantPublic Health Foundation of India, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7759-7218
Varun AgiwalIndian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1955-8832
G V S MurthyPublic Health Foundation of India, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5695-866X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe burden of cervical cancer in India is enormous, with more than 60,000 deaths being reported in 2020. The key intervention in the WHO's global strategy for the elimination of cervical cancer is to aim for the treatment and care of 90% of women diagnosed with cervical lesions. The current screen-and-treat approach as an option for resource-limited health care systems where screening of the cervix with visual inspection with acetic acid application (VIA) is followed by immediate ablative treatment by nurses in the case of a positive test. This approach often results in overtreatment, owing to the subjective nature of the test. Unnecessary treatments can be diminished with the use of emerging computer-assisted visual evaluation technology, using artificial intelligence (AI) tool to triage VIA-positive women. The aim of this study was (1) to develop a VIA-AI tool using cervical images to identify and categorize the VIA-screen-positive areas for eligibility and suitability for ablative treatment, and (2) to understand the efficacy of the VIA-AI tool in guiding the nurses to decide on treatment eligibility in the screen-and-treat cervical screening program.

methodsThis was an exploratory, interventional study. The VIA-AI tool was developed using deep-learning AI from the image bank collected in our previously conducted screening programs. This VIA-AI tool was then pilot-tested in an ongoing nurse-led VIA screening program.

resultsA comparative assessment of the cervical features performed in all women using the VIA-AI tool showed clinical accuracy of 76%. The perceived challenge rate for false positives was 20%.

conclusionThis novel cervical image-based VIA-AI algorithm showed promising results in real-life settings, and could help minimize overtreatment in single-visit VIA screening and treatment programs in resource-constrained situations.

Indexed as

Acetic AcidArtificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCervix UteriFemaleHumansIndiaMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsAcetic Acid

Identifiers

PMID39666915
PMCPMC11684514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.