ArticlePloS one2024
Cannabis use and heart transplant listing: A survey of clinician practices.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of Cannabis use and Survival in patients with heart failure: A claims-based cohort study of commercially insured adults.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
No consensus exists for heart transplant listing for patients who use cannabis. We conducted a web-based survey to assess knowledge, and practice patterns towards patients with heart failure who use cannabis referred for transplant. A total of 140 clinicians (cardiologists (41.4%, n = 58), surgeons (7.1%, n = 10), pharmacists (9.3%, n = 13), advanced practice providers and coordinators) responded and responses were grouped by whether they responded that cannabis is "illegal in my state" (illegal), or "legal for medical and recreational use in my state," (legal). There was a statistically significant difference in responses between the groups in the frequency of cannabis use that should preclude a patient from HT listing p = 0.0330) with respondents where cannabis is legal tending to answer that higher frequencies were acceptable. The groups in the "legal group" responded that a validated cannabis screening questionnaire could evaluate HT eligibility (p = 0.0111). A majority in the illegal group responding "No" as to whether their program allows pre- or post-transplant patients to use prescribed cannabis products (p < 0.0001). A majority in the illegal group responding "No" while the majority in the legal group responded "Yes" to "Does your HT center's current selection criteria policy address medical cannabis use in potential transplant candidates?" (p = 0.0001). Health care providers generally agreed that a validated cannabis use disorder screening questionnaire would be useful and that 6 months of abstinence from cannabis is sufficient prior to HT listing. Significant heterogeneity exists regarding cannabis use as it relates to heart transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.