ArticlePloS one2024
Racial differences and geographic variations in oral anticoagulation treatment among Medicare patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Observational Study of Post-hip Fracture Outcomes in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Atrial Fibrillation Risk Management and Emerging Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUse of oral anticoagulants (OACs) for stroke reduction in atrial fibrillation (AF) varies by race and geography within the United States. We seek to better understand the relationship between OAC underutilization, race, and US geography.
methodsPatients with AF were selected from the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims database from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016. The final population consisted of patients with 12 months of health plan enrollment before and after their index AF diagnosis, with a baseline CHAD2S2-VASc ≥2 and of either Black or White race (other races are underrepresented in the data). Among those with AF that met the inclusion criteria, patients who were prescribed warfarin or DOACs within 12 months after the index date were extracted. Each patient was assigned to a US county based on their 5-digit zip code and OAC use was stratified by race. Statistically significant differences were determined by student's t-test and chi-square.
resultsOf the 2,390,830 final patients, 94.1% were White and 5.9% were Black patients. Mean (SD) age and HASBLED scores were 78 (9) and 3.9 (1.2) respectively, for Black patients and 80 (9) and 3.3 (1.2), respectively, for White patients (p<0.0001). The mean (SD) CHAD2S2-VASc scores were 4.5 (1.9) for White patients, and 5.3 (1.9) for Black patients with p<0.0001, respectively. Black patients (vs White patients) had a higher non-treatment (no DOAC or warfarin) rate (56.1% vs 47.4%, p<0.0001) across the US which was particularly notable in the southeast. In addition, treatment rates were highly variable within each US state. Counties with dense population more frequently demonstrated significant differences by race than counties with sparse population.
conclusionOur study showed differences in the use of OACs across US counties and among various racial groups. These disparities highlighted the areas of unmet need for both Black and White patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.