Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666705›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2024

A systematic review of longitudinal risk and protective factors for loneliness in youth.

Susanne Buecker, Kimberly Petersen, Anne Neuber, Yixuan Zheng, Daniel Hayes, Pamela Qualter

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adolescent Loneliness Trends and Contextual Correlates Across 38 Countries From 2000 to 2022.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Time and Frequency of Social Media Use and Loneliness Among U.S. Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susanne BueckerSchool of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3443-5400
Kimberly PetersenSchool of Education, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anne NeuberSchool of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Yixuan ZhengInstitute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Daniel HayesInstitute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK.
Pamela QualterInstitute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6114-3820

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 497278260Kavli Trust GrantThe Prudence Trust INSPYRE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To effectively tackle loneliness in youth, prevention and intervention strategies should be based on solid evidence regarding risk and protective factors in this age group. This systematic literature review identifies and narratively synthesizes longitudinal studies of risk and protective factors for loneliness in children and adolescents aged below 25 years. A systematic literature search was conducted in October 2023 using PsycINFO and MEDLINE, resulting in n = 398 articles, with n = 105 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The examined factors included demographic (e.g., gender), socioeconomic (e.g., income sufficiency), social (e.g., peer acceptance), mental health (e.g., depression), physical health (e.g., disabilities), health behavior (e.g., sport participation), and psychological factors (e.g., shyness). Additionally, adverse childhood experiences (e.g., child maltreatment) and environmental factors (e.g., neighborhood characteristics) were investigated. Despite the wide range of potential risk and protective factors examined, relatively few studies provided strong evidence for a prospective association with loneliness. Risk factors that were consistently identified across multiple longitudinal studies included low peer acceptance and peer victimization, depression, social anxiety, internalizing symptoms, low self-esteem, shyness, and neuroticism. Additional replication is required to evaluate factors that have shown significant associations with loneliness in only a limited number of longitudinal studies (e.g., aggression).

Indexed as

LonelinessProtective FactorsAdolescentChildDepressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental HealthPeer GroupRisk FactorsYoung Adultlonelinesslongitudinalprotective factorrisk factorsystematic reviewyouth

Identifiers

PMID39666705
PMCPMC11668506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.