Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Advanced susceptibility analysis of ground deformation disasters using large language models and machine learning: A Hangzhou City case study.

Bofan Yu, Huaixue Xing, Weiya Ge, Liling Zhou, Jiaxing Yan, Yun-An Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bofan YuNanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing, The People's Republic of China.
Huaixue XingNanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing, The People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-8423-6011
Weiya GeNanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing, The People's Republic of China.
Liling ZhouThe Institute of Geological Survey of China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), The People's Republic of China.
Jiaxing YanZhejiang Institute of Geosciences, Observation and Research Station of Zhejiang Coastal Urban Geological Security, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, The People's Republic of China.
Yun-An LiZhejiang Institute of Geosciences, Observation and Research Station of Zhejiang Coastal Urban Geological Security, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, The People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the prevailing scenario where comprehensive susceptibility assessments of ground deformation disasters primarily rely on knowledge-driven models, with weight judgments largely founded on expert subjective assessments, this study initially explores the feasibility of integrating data-driven models into the evaluation of urban ground collapse and subsidence. Hangzhou city, characterized by filled soil and silty sand, was selected as the representative study area. Nine pertinent evaluation factors were identified, and the RF-BP neural network coupling model was employed to assess the susceptibility of ground collapse and subsidence in the study area, the results indicate that the stacked model achieved a 7% increase in AUC value compared to the single model. Subsequently, this study utilized the advanced large language model (LLM), ChatGPT-4, to supplant expert judgment in the weight determination of ground deformation disasters. The advantages of ChatGPT-4, such as its ability to process vast amounts of data and provide consistent, unbiased judgments, were highlighted. ChatGPT-4's assessments were validated by geological experts in the study area through the analytic hierarchy process. The results show that, by analyzing the same textual materials, the weights determined by experts differed by only 3% from those judged by ChatGPT, demonstrating the reliability and human-expert-like logic of ChatGPT-4's judgments. Finally, a comprehensive susceptibility assessment of ground deformation disasters was conducted utilizing ChatGPT-4's judgment results, yielding favorable outcomes.

Indexed as

DisastersMachine LearningChinaCitiesHumansLanguageModels, TheoreticalNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID39666691
PMCPMC11637310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.