Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666656›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Using knowledge translation to support the use of evaluation findings: A case study of the linda mama free maternity program in Kenya.

Fatuma H Guleid, Stacey Orangi, Angela Kairu, Brian Arwa, Janet Keru, Anne Musuva, Ileana Vilcu, Anooj Pattnaik, Nirmala Ravishankar, Edwine Barasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fatuma H GuleidHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8103-8136
Stacey OrangiHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3236-5229
Angela KairuHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0965-4460
Brian ArwaHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Janet KeruThinkWell, Nairobi, Kenya.
Anne MusuvaThinkWell, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6917-9131
Ileana VilcuThinkwell, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anooj PattnaikThinkWell, Washington DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-0579
Nirmala RavishankarBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Washington DC, United States of America.
Edwine BarasaHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-007094Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using program evaluation findings is crucial in improving health programs and realising the program's benefits. In this article, we report on how a knowledge translation (KT) approach supported the use of evaluation findings to improve the Linda Mama free maternity program in Kenya. We used a case study design employing qualitative approaches to describe our KT strategy and its impact on evaluation use. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews of participants (n = 25) in three Kenyan counties following dissemination of the evaluation findings and co-production of action plans based on the evaluation. The findings suggest modest improvements in the implementation of Linda Mama in 3 Kenyan counties facilitated by application of the evaluation findings. However, these improvements were not uniform across and within the counties. Challenges such as the COVID-19 restrictions, lack of infrastructure and delayed reimbursement of funds hindered the full implementation of the action plans. The KT strategy was a key facilitator for the improvements. The dissemination and deliberation workshops provided learning spaces for stakeholders, ensuring that each perspective was considered. The participatory method used in developing the action plans also improved communication between stakeholder groups. Participants reported that this approach made aware them of the gaps in implementation and motivated them to realise the full potential of the Linda Mama program. Using KT, especially when evaluating and refining the implementation of complex health programs with multiple stakeholders, is useful in improving the uptake of evaluation findings. However, it can be challenging to sustain such engagement with stakeholders. In addition, contextual factors that affect uptake need to be considered and navigated. Finally, significant investment (both in human resource and financial) in such approaches is required if KT is to be successful.

Identifiers

PMID39666656
PMCPMC11637383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.