Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666641›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A helping hand: Applying behavioural science and co-design methodology to improve hand hygiene compliance in the hospital setting.

Calea-Jay Blair, Clare McCrudden, Alix Brazier, Sarah Huf, Alice Gregory, Fiona O'Driscoll, Tracey Galletly, Clare Leon-Villapalos, Helen Brown, Kristina Clay and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Calea-Jay BlairInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Clare McCruddenHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alix BrazierBehavioural Insights Team, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah HufInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0971-2149
Alice GregoryHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona O'DriscollHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4315-9954
Tracey GalletlyImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Clare Leon-VillapalosImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Helen BrownBehavioural Insights Team, London, United Kingdom.
Kristina ClayImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Shona MaxwellImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Raymond AnakweImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Kate GraileyCentre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4104-8444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compliance with hand hygiene is an effective way of reducing the incidence of healthcare acquired infections (HCAI). At one London National Health Service (NHS) Trust, improving hand hygiene compliance (HHC) was a patient safety priority in response to non-compliance and ongoing occurrences of HCAI. The objective of this study was to co-design a behavioural science informed intervention to improve HHC. To obtain a baseline level of HHC and understand associated behaviours, 18 hours of observation were undertaken on three inpatient wards. These focused upon Moment 1 and 5 of the World Health Organisation's moments for hand hygiene. The intervention was co-designed with clinical staff and took the form of "visual primes". Three different stickers designed to create a motivational "nudge" were placed at key points where HHC had been observed to fail. Following implementation, a further 18 hours of observation took place. A Chi-squared statistical analysis compared proportions of HHC pre- and post-intervention. Our intervention led to an 11% increase in HHC across the three study wards for both Moments (X2 (1, N = 1,285) = 13.711, p = <0.001) in the six weeks following the intervention. The intervention had a more marked effect on Moment 1, (with an increase of 15%, X2 (1, N = 667) = 17.091, p = <0.001 when compared to the change in compliance with Moment 5 (11%, X2 (1, N = 652) = 7.449, p = 0.06). This study demonstrated that utilising behavioural science in the co-design and placement of visual motivational nudges can significantly improve compliance with hand hygiene practices. We highlight the benefit of co-design when designing interventions-both in terms of engagement with and efficacy of the intervention.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceHand HygieneBehavioral SciencesCross InfectionHospitalsHumansLondon

Identifiers

PMID39666641
PMCPMC11637355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.