Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666635›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Conservation futures 2050: Developing future scenarios to explore potential socio-economic developments and their impact on biodiversity.

Jennifer L Bufford, Angela J Brandt, Anne-Gaelle Ausseil, Amanda Black, Bradley S Case, Adam Sean Forbes, Catherine Kirby, Rowan Sprague, Anita Wreford, Duane A Peltzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Overcoming barriers to build partnerships for managing plant invasions under global change.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer L BuffordManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3320-6024
Angela J BrandtManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5980-9128
Anne-Gaelle AusseilMinistry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-0774
Amanda BlackBioprotection Aotearoa, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Bradley S CaseSchool of Science, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Adam Sean ForbesForbes Ecology Limited, Hastings, New Zealand.
Catherine KirbyEntelea Scicom, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Rowan SpragueManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Anita WrefordFaculty of Environment, Society and Design, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Duane A PeltzerManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large scale changes in biodiversity and conservation management require long-term goals and planning across multiple sectors in the face of increasing global change. Major trends in land use and management interventions, species additions or losses, and climate are well recognized, but responses are still often short-term and fragmented across agencies and sectors. Scenario-building can be a powerful tool to imagine possible futures, integrating across sectors and disciplines and promoting long-term thinking and planning. As an interdisciplinary team of experts, we developed potential scenarios for a range of future environmental conditions. The scenarios explored: increasing land ownership and stewardship of land by indigenous peoples (Māori); widespread afforestation using native tree species; national-scale eradication of invasive mammalian predators; and increasing frequency of extreme weather events. We explored the implications of these globally-relevant trends at a national scale using Aotearoa New Zealand as our study system. Detailed descriptions of these scenarios were developed by experts using environmental, economic, social science and policy lenses. Across scenarios several common themes were consistently highlighted, including the importance of land use in driving other conservation outcomes. How the value of ecosystem services is recognized and prioritized was also important to a wide range of outcomes. Furthermore, each scenario presented both opportunities and risks to equality, indigenous empowerment and human capital, emphasizing the importance of good policy responses to maximize benefits and minimize unintended harm. These scenarios will be used to stimulate new questions and ideas for biodiversity conservation and management, such as considering the implications of different potential futures for the management of biological invasions. This approach is explicitly designed to be generalisable across different sites or regions and provides a method for considering the implications of potential future changes for a broad range of disciplines or needs.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsEcosystemHumansNew ZealandSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID39666635
PMCPMC11637332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.