SynthesisPloS one2024
Effects of rivastigmine on gait in patients with neurodegenerative disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom prevalence and pharmacological management of late-stage Parkinson's disease (LSPD): a cross-sectional, multinational survey.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- The mechanisms and strategies for Alzheimer's disease prevention: An update.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsGait disturbances are commonly observed in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and higher-level gait disorders, which are associated with cholinergic deficits. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effects of rivastigmine on improvement in gait.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and text keywords related to gait and falls after rivastigmine treatment for neurodegenerative disorders. The intervention (rivastigmine), comparison (control or no treatment), and outcomes of improvement in gait speed and fall were assessed from database inception to April 2024. References and collected data were meticulously reviewed to ensure the integrity of the included studies. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and Hedges'g, along with their 95% confidence intervals (Cls), were calculated for gait speed and number of falls.
resultsA total of 222 articles were identified during the initial search across different electronic databases, 50 including PubMed (n = 23), Cochrane (n = 19), Embase (n = 139), Scopus (n = 38), and a manual search (n = 3). Finally, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on the final four studies, encompassing 286 participants. The pooled SMD for the overall gait speed without a comparison group was 0.761 (95% CI: -1.165 to 2.688), indicating no significant improvement in gait speed. For the overall number of falls between the rivastigmine treatment and control groups, the pooled SMD was -0.366 (95% CI: -0.650 to -0.083). A statistically significant reduction in the number of falls was observed in the rivastigmine group than in the control group.
conclusionRivastigmine treatment in patients with neurodegenerative disorders tend to improve gait speed and significantly reduces fall incidence. Given the limited efficacy of current treatments for gait disturbances and falls, dual cholinesterase inhibitors like rivastigmine could be a promising therapeutic option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.