ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2025
Epidemiology and treatment of Adamantiades-Behçet's disease in Germany: A healthcare claims database study.
Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epidemiology and treatment of Adamantiades-Behçet's disease in Germany: A healthcare claims database study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdamantiades-Behçet's disease (ABD) is a rare, chronic, relapsing, multisystem vasculitis, with a reported prevalence of 0.9 out of 100,000 population in Germany in 2012. However, more recent epidemiological data are lacking.
objectivesTo estimate the prevalence and incidence of ABD in Germany and assess associated comorbidities and current treatment patterns.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used claims data from the anonymized Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin (InGef) research database. Cohorts were formed for the observation years 2016, 2017 and 2018, using data from 2013 to 2018 (allowing for a 3-year baseline period for incidence data). The study population included patients ≥18 years old with a diagnosis of ABD (ICD-10 diagnostic code M35.2), covered under the statutory health insurance system and in the InGef research database, with continuous insurance in the observation year and baseline period. We descriptively evaluated prevalence (≥2 outpatient ABD diagnoses in different quarters/≥1 main inpatient diagnosis in the observation year), incidence (no confirmed outpatient/inpatient diagnosis in the baseline period), comorbidities reported during the study and ABD-related medications.
resultsWe identified 300, 303 and 329 patients diagnosed with ABD in 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively, with fewer than half (122/300 [40.7%], 127/303 [41.9%] and 150/329 [45.6%]) prescribed ≥1 disease-related medication. In the treated population, ABD prevalence was 3.9 (2016), 4.1 (2017) and 4.7 (2018) per 100,000 population; annual ABD incidence was 0.5 per 100,000 population in 2016 and 2017 and 0.6 per 100,000 population in 2018. The most commonly reported comorbidities in patients diagnosed with ABD were dorsalgia (an indicator of possible misdiagnosis), disorders of refraction and accommodation, and essential (primary) hypertension. Prednisolone, colchicine and azathioprine were the most commonly prescribed treatments for ABD, with approximately 15% of patients taking >1 medication for ABD.
conclusionsThe reported data provide evidence that ABD remains a rare disease in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.