Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666366›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2025

In-Office Suprachoroidal Viscopexy for Acute Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

Rajeev H Muni, Isabela Martins Melo, Sueellen Demian, Tomas Minelli, Hatim Batawi, John Park, Aurora Pecaku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rajeev H MuniDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Isabela Martins MeloDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sueellen DemianDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tomas MinelliDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hatim BatawiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aurora PecakuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In-office suprachoroidal viscopexy (SCVEXY) is a relatively new procedure for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), but minimal information is available regarding outcomes and safety. Objective: To report outcomes with in-office SCVEXY for primary acute RRD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case series was conducted at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada from June 2023 to February 2024 among consecutive patients with primary acute RRDs who presented with retinal tears that were reachable with the current in-office SCVEXY technique in the temporal or nasal retina. Exposure: Suprachoroidal injection of 0.6 mL of sodium hyaluronate, 2.3%, at the break location using a 30-gauge needle with a custom-made guard leaving 1 mm of the needle exposed. Laser retinopexy was applied around the break once reattachment was achieved. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was primary anatomic reattachment rate with SCVEXY and recovery of function and anatomic integrity. Results: Among 6 patients, 2 patients (33.3%) were female, and mean (SD) patient age was 52.5 (19.7) years. The final follow-up duration for each patient was 510, 420, 360, 360, 330, and 320 days, respectively. Baseline VAs were hand motions, counting fingers, 20/100, 20/100, 20/25, and hand motions for patients 1 through 6, respectively. A dome-shaped suprachoroidal buckle was present in all cases after the procedure. Five of 6 patients (83.3%) achieved anatomic reattachment with no retinal displacement or outer retinal folds, and these patients could resume normal activity immediately after the procedure with no restrictions. The mean (SD) logMAR VA at 3 months was +0.46 (0.34) (Snellen 20/57). The viscoelastic persisted in the suprachoroidal space as confirmed by multimodal imaging for 10, 14, 21, 13, 24, and 14 days, respectively, and the retina remained attached during the entire postoperative follow-up period. One patient's SCVEXY failed due to inadequate viscoelastic at the posterior edge of the retinal break, and this patient underwent a successful pneumatic retinopexy. One patient developed a localized choroidal effusion unrelated to the SCVEXY site following laser retinopexy that resolved in 1 week associated with topical prednisolone, 1%, 4 times daily and cyclopentolate, 1%, twice daily. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series, the outcomes of these 6 cases suggest that SCVEXY may offer durable retinal reattachment in RRD. However, randomized clinical trial data, larger sample sizes, and longer-term follow-up are necessary to assess the risk-benefit profile of SCVEXY compared with the standard of care.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresHyaluronic AcidRetinal DetachmentViscosupplementsAcute DiseaseAdultAgedChoroidFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesScleral BucklingTreatment OutcomeHyaluronic AcidViscosupplements

Identifiers

PMID39666366
PMCPMC11739999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.